Forum:Paranormal disappearances

< Index | RW Article discussion

Would it be feasible to create a "list of topics which while 'curious' do not meet the standards required for Rational Wiki articles" - eg Lord Lucan and the other persons mentioned on [[Famous for having vanished]]? This might avoid 'persistent creation and revision roundabouts.' 21:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

That list is also off-mission. Why do we need it? - π 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Since renamed to "paranormal disappearances", which I like, and I think is perfectly on-mission, relevant and interesting. ^narchist 22:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Agree with Armondikov. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

We should either be able to present rational reasons for their vanishing or refute crazy claims being made to explain why they've gone? --^{Ask me about your mother} 00:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, nice title, lousy article, if that's what it indeed is supposed to be. As far as the first question, how about asking here on the SB before leaping? Plenty of people will help you figure out if something is worth writing. Oh, and PS, writing a good article on a topic goes a long way to showing why it belongs on RW. Stubs and "work for other people" don't come across as well. ħuman 02:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

We need to stick a subforum on the new forum for "mission discussion" or whatever you want to call it. This sort of thing can then be handled there. Keeps it separate, keeps it organised. ^narchist 16:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

That's a good idea. ħuman 23:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)