Forum:Rationalwiki not so rational? :)

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello rationalwiki people and trolls :D

i just noticed after reading some of your articles, that many of them are just like the shit you skeptically "rationalize" xD

For instance on the "Third_Eye" article you just wrote that it's woo woo psychic powers bullshit lol. And that without taking into account more points of view xD or perhaps that's just the purpose?? maybe you're a troll site and i'm poor victim :(( lol

Another one i could mention is an article of nootropics i read here, there was no proper analysis and suddenly a conclusion that it was all woo lol.

it's funny and all, but if you are trying to make this look reasonable at all you ought to fix that :D

peace, bitches. — Unsigned, by: Mynamesd / talk / contribs

Thanks for this. I needed to have an excuse to get drunk. drink! Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 12:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
How's that novel coming along? I must say your writing leaves a lot to be desired. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 14:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm a sort of lazy bastard(es). Do you think that you could link to the articles in question. If what You say is true I might agree with you - but making it easy for people is a good idea.--Weirdstuff (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Third eye. I couldn't find any article on nootropicsWikipedia, perhaps they are lumped with something else, perhaps d remembers wrong.--ZooGuard (talk) 15:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
The first sentence after the greeting makes no sense.
The Third eye article is a stub, an entry-level article that needs to be expanded. Like most stubs, it's just a brief description of what it is about, not an in-depth comment. RationalWiki is a wiki, after all, a work in progress, not a collection of complete articles. Feel free to expand any stub with "proper analysis".
As for "looking reasonable", I suggest reading the link provided by Reckless Noise Symphony and RationalWiki:SPOV, not necessarily in that order.--ZooGuard (talk) 15:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I was wondering if that was even English for a minute. Scarlet A.pngssholeModerator 15:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)