Forum:Websites and Webshites

< Index | Site-related discussion

Following a discussion on our facebook group, it has come to my attention that the whitelist and blacklist of websites/resources we have includes a lot of news sources in the blacklist, but not too many in the whitelist. In the discussion on the facebook group, another user put forth the idea that we should give each a star rating based on credibility. Obviously, we could merge this into our articles on each of the sources, which will explain why we rated it as such. Some, like the guardian, might get, say, 4 stars for being generally reliable, but not 5, because of the strange thing they seem to have with their commenting, and Judaism, etc (just an example). This could be a significant addition to the site. What do you think? --P3A58NT86 10:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I wouldn't want to a site to drop a star because of the comments. Sophie^Wilder 20:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

You raise a good point. That is why I want to see where this discussion goes.--P3A58NT86 03:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)