|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Fun talk:Glastonbury
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Whoever did it, please do not immediately convert my articles to the 'Fun' version.
Arthur and Glastonbury deserve a serious article between them. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Prove it. There's certainly nothing here to justify it. Weaseloid
Methinks it is a Weasel 17:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Prove it. There's certainly nothing here to justify it. Weaseloid
- If you want your articles to stay in mainspace, keep the inanity to a minimum therein.
ListenerXTalkerX 17:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why do we need an article on "maybe Jesus visited glastonbury"? interesting myth, but what's there to refute? what's the anti-science/authoriarian thinking in this legend? If we do this we'll end up with useless stubs abiout Robin Hood or Hengist and Horsa. Or maybe Jackiespeel with honour us with an article called "List of early British myths not to write about"... Totnesmartin (talk) 18:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
