Fun talk:God porn

This might be salvageable, but it's gonna take some work... ħuman 18:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I must admit that I looked at it and wondered what its purpose was. Fun space? CP space? Is it a phrase in real use?--Bob^{Not Jim} 19:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I can't find anything beyong "oh my god-porn!" etc on the tubes. meanwhile, this article appears to be random stuff of the top of somebody's head. I think we should delete. Totnesmartin 19:15, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Seconded. Sorry Tarantula. SJ ^Debaser 19:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I find "porn god". Let's send it to fun?--Bob^{Not Jim} 19:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah move it yeah. ħuman 20:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it's off the top of my head. Call it original research, I didn't think anyone would take it seriously enough to google it. Tarantallegra 21:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 23:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I sided with the deletionists. 1. Not very funny, really, although idea had potential. 2. "Author" didn't move it out of harm's way into fun before I got on my high horse. ħuman 05:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Not funny eh? But where else do you point out that a lot of fundamentalism is in fact power-porn, or God-porn? Perhaps you do. Have you got another name for it? Tarantallegra 06:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Interesting question. But what definition of pornography are you using?--Bob^{Not Jim} 06:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Tarantella, it ain't killed forever. Just make a better case for it, rename it, or include it in another article? ħuman 06:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

PS, and maybe ignore CP in the next version? CP refs tend to make people a bit shy of this sort of article in the mainspace. (Or, at least, me...) ħuman 06:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

My inclination would be to resurrect it and send it to fun. T (or others) can work on it there and maybe it can come back. He seems inclined to defend it so give him the opportunity.--Bob^{Not Jim} 07:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Thy will be done. ħuman 07:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Great. Let's see Tarantella wished to develop it further.--Bob^{Not Jim} 15:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)