RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?/August 2009
August 2009[edit]
|
|
6 |
During the Exodus, RW members display a user box detailing their views on creationism. PJR and LowKey completely fly off the handle: the text is offensive, the graphic is offensive, and "'Magic man done it' isn't science" is somehow a straw-man argument. |
|
|
-3 |
Hang on, weren't you on vacation? |
|
|
-3 |
PJR comes out and tells Ken to stop his link spamming. Well, not directly, you have to follow the link first. Update: Ken sees the note... and two minutes later announces |
|
|
-2 |
Publius lays in to the "influence of evolution" tripe & Bradley promises a ban. Moer: Bradley demands that Publius does as he's told & gives him a 1 second ban. Ironically it appears on Rc immediately after an edit by GregL to "Authoritarianism" which includes the sentence: "* Lack of democratic participation in policy making." |
|
|
6 |
Don't worry, citizens! Ken is on the case! |
|
|
12 |
It's official. KenLopezative can't tell Darler and Hitwin apart. He's done brainwashed himself! |
|
|
8 |
Jeeves makes an heroic effort to convince PJR that creationism is not science. PJR responds: It is demonstrably false that creationists start with a fixed conclusion. |
|
|
2 |
To channel Arthur Carlson of WKRP - "as God as my witness, I too thought Ken was going somewhere else with this." |
|
|
1 |
In an obvious cry for help, Ruylopez announces he plans to kill himself with work. Dude, back away. Even worse, he's threatening to end his boycott of RationalWiki! |
|
|
0 |
As PJR's arguments in favour of God's existence continue to dig below the bottom of the barrel, A.Fox decides to give it a scrape as he goes by. UPDATE: PJR does not like even the implication of swearing on his nice clean Wiki, and he is not fond of "Ed-style links" either. |
|
|
3 |
PJR (an Australian!) deletes "bloody". I thought it was a compulsory part of every Strine sentence. |
|
|
-5 |
Consistency? We don't need no stinkin' consistency; with God all things are possible! |
|
|
1 |
"Remove silly response from a banned user, further reply re 'evolutionist'." Phillip twists in the wind when people find his use of language "offensive". Follow the diffs, it's always fun. |
|
|
5 |
and so it begins Censoring a whole reasoned argument because of one word: "pet". |
|
|
1 |