There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:Room 202
(Redirected from RationalWiki talk:Room 202)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Do we want to encourage bannings? - User 23:10, 2 December 2008 (EST)
- By your comment, I am assuming you are referring to arbitary abd unneeded bans. I am, in this criteria, simply referring to bans made to say, Fr(e(d)), tit, or my password is _____, as well as various wandals who come around stirring up trouble. I honestly think that bans should only be handed out as a last cause, however, and I am not trying to encourage any more than needed. Javasca₧ wasn't me!
It's amazing the sort of cruft that's left in the dustbin of RationalWiki history. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- ^ ТyComplaints 01:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sure I've made over 100 bans by now - where's my gold hammer? Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 01:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Conservapedia[edit]
Would they have Room (error) 404? Anna Livia (talk) 23:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)