There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki talk:Wiki fact/RW fact 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aren't we not on RW 3.0 now? sshole 10:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well I suppose if you want to rewrite the fact you can. - π 10:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I just wasn't sure how "official" the 3.0 is. I know it's vaguely where RW changed from focusing entirely on Conservapedia and starting to expand, but one can argue we haven't completed that transition yet... 2.5?
sshole 11:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I just wasn't sure how "official" the 3.0 is. I know it's vaguely where RW changed from focusing entirely on Conservapedia and starting to expand, but one can argue we haven't completed that transition yet... 2.5?