Edit filter configuration

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Differences between versions

ItemVersion from 14:38, 16 January 2014 by Nutty RouxVersion from 15:20, 18 January 2014 by Nutty Roux
Basic information
Notes:
 
See if we can cut down on the false positives and be more permissive to new users wanting to post links on their user pages. Pattern seems to be two HTML line breaks - test whether this is generally true enough and serves new users better.
 
See if we can cut down on the false positives and be more permissive to new users wanting to post links on their user pages. Pattern seems to be two HTML line breaks - test whether this is generally true enough and serves new users better.
  
 
Update 2014-01-06: not always true. Gabe has been finding a few cases that don't fit the pattern that would be caught by this more general, though I think fair, filter. Removing check for linebreak and just arbitrarily deciding that non-autoconfirmed users ought to be able to do whatever they want if they've got more than 3 edits.
 
Update 2014-01-06: not always true. Gabe has been finding a few cases that don't fit the pattern that would be caught by this more general, though I think fair, filter. Removing check for linebreak and just arbitrarily deciding that non-autoconfirmed users ought to be able to do whatever they want if they've got more than 3 edits.
 +
 +
2014-01-19 setting to 1 edit, but will open us up to previous accounts with expired blocks and at least 1 edit being able to spam. I guess this is only a theoretical problem.
Filter conditions
Conditions:
 
!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups)
 
!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups)
& (user_editcount <= 3)
+
& (user_editcount <= 1)
 
& (action == "edit")
 
& (action == "edit")
 
& ((article_articleid == 0)|(length(added_links) >= 1))
 
& ((article_articleid == 0)|(length(added_links) >= 1))
 
& (article_namespace == 2)
 
& (article_namespace == 2)