User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 01:36, 12 December 2015 diff hist +28 m Talk:Scott Alexander →NPOV: Always preview.
- 01:35, 12 December 2015 diff hist +145 Talk:Scott Alexander →NPOV: Link to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_J._Russell]
- 08:59, 9 May 2013 diff hist +249 Fatwa envy George fucking Carey
- 11:19, 18 November 2012 diff hist -216 m Talk:LessWrong Reverted edits by Ciphergoth (talk) to last revision by Dmytry
- 11:14, 18 November 2012 diff hist +216 Talk:LessWrong →The latest drama
- 12:15, 12 April 2012 diff hist +8 LessWrong →The ugly: David Gerard, you are the poster child for undiscriminating skepticism, though you've been forced to recant some on cryonics.
- 12:12, 12 April 2012 diff hist -3 LessWrong →The bad: It's just not true that those who don't buy cryonics, singularity etc are treated like closed-minded morons.
- 12:10, 12 April 2012 diff hist +1 LessWrong This is just one small part. The basis is cognitive psychology, decision theory, information theory and such.
- 19:49, 27 March 2012 diff hist +2 LessWrong →The bad: always preview.
- 19:48, 27 March 2012 diff hist +151 LessWrong →The bad: Lots of people on LW are not on board with that bundle, as it happens.
- 13:10, 27 March 2012 diff hist +9 LessWrong "aspiring rationalist" is the current in phrase on LW.
- 10:12, 2 February 2011 diff hist +119 Talk:Deepity →Two more examples
- 21:47, 31 January 2011 diff hist +743 N Talk:Deepity Two more examples
- 12:54, 1 November 2010 diff hist +138 Eliezer Yudkowsky →Fan fiction: Add Eliezer Yudkowsky Facts
- 18:00, 12 September 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Nanotechnology →Links I'm not sure you have: fix bullets
- 17:52, 12 September 2010 diff hist +696 Talk:Nanotechnology two anti-nano articles rather better than that Mark Pack one.
- 11:52, 18 April 2010 diff hist +9 Cryonics →Organisational problems
- 11:31, 5 March 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Cryonics →What is it with the spurious probabilities?: remove colon
- 11:31, 5 March 2010 diff hist +193 Talk:Cryonics →What is it with the spurious probabilities?: Cox's theorem
- 13:01, 20 February 2010 diff hist +6 Cryonics →External links: Wow, {{cp}} have a weirdly-sober article about it. Surely it's against all laws of God and man?
- 12:55, 20 February 2010 diff hist +22 Cryonics →External links: add {{Wikipedia article}} template
- 11:04, 20 February 2010 diff hist +19 Cryonics →The current state of cryonics: {{citation needed}}
- 08:34, 19 February 2010 diff hist +254 Talk:Cryonics →Ben Best Debate: Was there really no objection more worthy of your time and energy?
- 23:30, 17 February 2010 diff hist +261 Talk:Cryonics →Couple of random thoughts: It's shutdown/reboot?
- 10:18, 17 February 2010 diff hist +2 m Talk:Cryonics →Ted Williams's Head: fix emphasis
- 08:31, 17 February 2010 diff hist +603 Talk:Cryonics →Ted Williams's Head: new section
- 08:25, 17 February 2010 diff hist +192 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: I mean experts in existing fields
- 22:32, 16 February 2010 diff hist +204 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Well, I'm convinced!
- 22:30, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,507 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: Did someone step on my pet toe? At some length...
- 21:25, 16 February 2010 diff hist +408 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: I've known DG for many years
- 19:36, 16 February 2010 diff hist +364 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: I'm Paul Crowley, and so's my wife
- 19:23, 16 February 2010 diff hist +280 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: How about Wikipedia?
- 19:20, 16 February 2010 diff hist +748 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": More on Drexler
- 17:58, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: more colons == better colons!
- 17:57, 16 February 2010 diff hist +647 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: Learn about Bayes Theorem and stop with the Gish Gallop.
- 17:53, 16 February 2010 diff hist +561 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Drexler is pro-cryonics
- 17:13, 16 February 2010 diff hist +93 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": ~~~~ sorry!
- 17:13, 16 February 2010 diff hist +218 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Who's a good nanotechnologist?
- 17:08, 16 February 2010 diff hist +285 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: Only an expert knows whether you're hair-splitting.
- 17:07, 16 February 2010 diff hist +256 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: And a legitimate business doesn't mind being called fraudulent? I think not.
- 17:05, 16 February 2010 diff hist +311 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": P
- 12:43, 16 February 2010 diff hist +380 Talk:Cryonics →Problems to solve: What are they supposed to say to Christians?
- 12:36, 16 February 2010 diff hist +47 N User:Ciphergoth Link to my home page. current
- 12:35, 16 February 2010 diff hist +512 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: They were accused of fraud; what did you expect them to do?
- 12:29, 16 February 2010 diff hist +325 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: David's position on this has changed.