There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 01:36, 12 December 2015 diff hist +28 m Talk:Scott Alexander →NPOV: Always preview.
- 01:35, 12 December 2015 diff hist +145 Talk:Scott Alexander →NPOV: Link to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_J._Russell]
- 08:59, 9 May 2013 diff hist +249 Fatwa envy George fucking Carey
- 11:19, 18 November 2012 diff hist -216 m Talk:LessWrong Reverted edits by Ciphergoth (talk) to last revision by Dmytry
- 11:14, 18 November 2012 diff hist +216 Talk:LessWrong →The latest drama
- 12:15, 12 April 2012 diff hist +8 LessWrong →The ugly: David Gerard, you are the poster child for undiscriminating skepticism, though you've been forced to recant some on cryonics.
- 12:12, 12 April 2012 diff hist -3 LessWrong →The bad: It's just not true that those who don't buy cryonics, singularity etc are treated like closed-minded morons.
- 12:10, 12 April 2012 diff hist +1 LessWrong This is just one small part. The basis is cognitive psychology, decision theory, information theory and such.
- 19:49, 27 March 2012 diff hist +2 LessWrong →The bad: always preview.
- 19:48, 27 March 2012 diff hist +151 LessWrong →The bad: Lots of people on LW are not on board with that bundle, as it happens.
- 13:10, 27 March 2012 diff hist +9 LessWrong "aspiring rationalist" is the current in phrase on LW.
- 10:12, 2 February 2011 diff hist +119 Talk:Deepity →Two more examples
- 21:47, 31 January 2011 diff hist +743 N Talk:Deepity Two more examples
- 12:54, 1 November 2010 diff hist +138 Eliezer Yudkowsky →Fan fiction: Add Eliezer Yudkowsky Facts
- 18:00, 12 September 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Nanotechnology →Links I'm not sure you have: fix bullets
- 17:52, 12 September 2010 diff hist +696 Talk:Nanotechnology two anti-nano articles rather better than that Mark Pack one.
- 11:52, 18 April 2010 diff hist +9 Cryonics →Organisational problems
- 11:31, 5 March 2010 diff hist -1 Talk:Cryonics →What is it with the spurious probabilities?: remove colon
- 11:31, 5 March 2010 diff hist +193 Talk:Cryonics →What is it with the spurious probabilities?: Cox's theorem
- 13:01, 20 February 2010 diff hist +6 Cryonics →External links: Wow, {{cp}} have a weirdly-sober article about it. Surely it's against all laws of God and man?
- 12:55, 20 February 2010 diff hist +22 Cryonics →External links: add {{Wikipedia article}} template
- 11:04, 20 February 2010 diff hist +19 Cryonics →The current state of cryonics: {{citation needed}}
- 08:34, 19 February 2010 diff hist +254 Talk:Cryonics →Ben Best Debate: Was there really no objection more worthy of your time and energy?
- 23:30, 17 February 2010 diff hist +261 Talk:Cryonics →Couple of random thoughts: It's shutdown/reboot?
- 10:18, 17 February 2010 diff hist +2 m Talk:Cryonics →Ted Williams's Head: fix emphasis
- 08:31, 17 February 2010 diff hist +603 Talk:Cryonics →Ted Williams's Head: new section
- 08:25, 17 February 2010 diff hist +192 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: I mean experts in existing fields
- 22:32, 16 February 2010 diff hist +204 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Well, I'm convinced!
- 22:30, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1,507 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: Did someone step on my pet toe? At some length...
- 21:25, 16 February 2010 diff hist +408 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: I've known DG for many years
- 19:36, 16 February 2010 diff hist +364 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: I'm Paul Crowley, and so's my wife
- 19:23, 16 February 2010 diff hist +280 Talk:Cryonics →Contributions welcome: How about Wikipedia?
- 19:20, 16 February 2010 diff hist +748 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": More on Drexler
- 17:58, 16 February 2010 diff hist +1 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: more colons == better colons!
- 17:57, 16 February 2010 diff hist +647 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: Learn about Bayes Theorem and stop with the Gish Gallop.
- 17:53, 16 February 2010 diff hist +561 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Drexler is pro-cryonics
- 17:13, 16 February 2010 diff hist +93 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": ~~~~ sorry!
- 17:13, 16 February 2010 diff hist +218 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": Who's a good nanotechnologist?
- 17:08, 16 February 2010 diff hist +285 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: Only an expert knows whether you're hair-splitting.
- 17:07, 16 February 2010 diff hist +256 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: And a legitimate business doesn't mind being called fraudulent? I think not.
- 17:05, 16 February 2010 diff hist +311 Talk:Cryonics →"And then a miracle occurs": P
- 12:43, 16 February 2010 diff hist +380 Talk:Cryonics →Problems to solve: What are they supposed to say to Christians?
- 12:36, 16 February 2010 diff hist +47 N User:Ciphergoth Link to my home page. current
- 12:35, 16 February 2010 diff hist +512 Talk:Cryonics →Science or pseudoscience?: They were accused of fraud; what did you expect them to do?
- 12:29, 16 February 2010 diff hist +325 Talk:Cryonics →Best's paper: David's position on this has changed.