User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 14:04, 1 July 2014 diff hist -598 Effective altruism why be spiteful? We can do better.
- 13:46, 1 July 2014 diff hist -598 Effective altruism "lies" is playground abuse. Like RW, EA is an aspiration if not an achievement.
- 12:48, 1 July 2014 diff hist +54 Effective altruism balance
- 12:41, 1 July 2014 diff hist +1,342 Effective altruism readers should be allowed to know the rationale behind the different strands of EA; by all means add a critique (if appropriate).
- 09:42, 28 June 2014 diff hist +421 Talk:Effective altruism balance
- 09:22, 28 June 2014 diff hist -20 Effective altruism disappointing link to "useful idiot" removed (again). Let's strengthen RationalWiki, not discredit it with playground abuse.
- 06:54, 28 June 2014 diff hist -20 Effective altruism tendentious link from "other members" to "useful idiot" removed.
- 06:31, 28 June 2014 diff hist +901 Talk:Effective altruism balance
- 16:07, 27 June 2014 diff hist +416 Effective altruism as it stands, this scurrilous piece of nonsense is an embarrassment to RationalWiki. A few lines tagged on at the foot of the page don't really redress the balance. Can a competent expert give this some attention?
- 12:14, 27 June 2014 diff hist +416 Effective altruism balance
- 20:24, 7 June 2014 diff hist +481 Talk:Non-materialist neuroscience →Balance
- 12:42, 7 June 2014 diff hist +96 m Talk:Non-materialist neuroscience added sig
- 12:41, 7 June 2014 diff hist +543 Talk:Non-materialist neuroscience →Balance
- 12:14, 7 June 2014 diff hist +121 Philosophical naturalism The confusion of philosophical naturalism with naïve positivism is scientifically illiterate.
- 11:23, 7 June 2014 diff hist +121 m Philosophical naturalism philosophical naturalism is not naïve positivism
- 11:13, 7 June 2014 diff hist +390 Talk:Non-materialist neuroscience →Balance: new section
- 10:44, 7 June 2014 diff hist +434 Non-materialist neuroscience rationalists put views they disagree with as clearly and fair-mindedly as possible before critiquing them: we have nothing to fear.
- 10:40, 7 June 2014 diff hist +195 Quantum consciousness scientific rationalists may disagree: they should not simply delete.
- 10:32, 7 June 2014 diff hist +434 Non-materialist neuroscience scientifically literate folk recognise we have a problem: we should acknowledge it rather than hide it.
- 10:28, 7 June 2014 diff hist +195 Quantum consciousness rationalists debate not delete, or else we give rationalism a bad name. Perhaps a section to Talk?
- 10:23, 7 June 2014 diff hist +434 Non-materialist neuroscience The Hard Problem of consciousness is a problem for materialism just as the Hard Problem of fossils is a problem for Creationism
- 10:17, 7 June 2014 diff hist +195 Quantum consciousness Rationalists critique what we disagree with; we don't need to supress or parody it.
- 23:23, 6 June 2014 diff hist +167 Quantum consciousness classical physics is false.
- 23:17, 6 June 2014 diff hist +28 Quantum consciousness
- 23:10, 6 June 2014 diff hist +434 Non-materialist neuroscience the Hard Problem arises from the plausible assumption that the intrinsic nature of the physical is devoid of phenomenal properties. Strawsonian physicalists contest this assumption.
- 19:26, 6 June 2014 diff hist +434 Non-materialist neuroscience the intrinsic nature of the physical is a contested issue among scientific rationalists
- 18:48, 6 June 2014 diff hist +331 Quantum consciousness unwarranted deletion restored; perhaps discuss further in Talk?
- 07:04, 6 June 2014 diff hist -5 m Quantum consciousness
- 07:03, 6 June 2014 diff hist +336 Quantum consciousness balance