There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 01:45, 8 January 2011 diff hist +237 Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 01:43, 8 January 2011 diff hist +72 LessWrong →The ugly: okay, one more ref :p
- 01:36, 8 January 2011 diff hist +157 LessWrong →The ugly: added refs
- 21:36, 7 January 2011 diff hist +2,024 LessWrong →The ugly: moved fourth draft of censoring from talk page to the main page
- 21:35, 7 January 2011 diff hist +393 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: reply
- 20:21, 6 January 2011 diff hist +1,084 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: replies
- 04:46, 6 January 2011 diff hist +296 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: replied to jim
- 04:05, 6 January 2011 diff hist +356 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: replied to jim
- 03:41, 6 January 2011 diff hist +1,854 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: fleshed out reply to jimrandomh
- 03:04, 6 January 2011 diff hist +170 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell: reply to jimrandomh
- 02:59, 6 January 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell: lines got mismerged
- 02:58, 6 January 2011 diff hist +444 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: found the correct ref
- 02:44, 6 January 2011 diff hist -406 Talk:LessWrong Undo revision 709888 by Waitingforgodel (talk) -- never mind, that only made it more confusing to my PM
- 02:40, 6 January 2011 diff hist +406 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: prodded to show work so I showed my work :p
- 02:17, 6 January 2011 diff hist -8 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell: unclear antecedent
- 02:12, 6 January 2011 diff hist +1,067 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: replies
- 00:04, 6 January 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 23:13, 5 January 2011 diff hist +885 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: replies
- 22:34, 5 January 2011 diff hist +41 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: one more reference :)
- 22:18, 5 January 2011 diff hist +29 Talk:LessWrong added footnotes to remove a template error of some kind
- 22:15, 5 January 2011 diff hist +95 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: added refs (the only ref for paragraphs 2 & 3 is the google cache link, which is already referenced)
- 22:05, 5 January 2011 diff hist +3 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 22:04, 5 January 2011 diff hist +14 m Talk:LessWrong →Hell: minor copy edit
- 22:04, 5 January 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: added what I hope was a correct indentation modification.
- 22:02, 5 January 2011 diff hist +630 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: added warning and correction re: donors. replied
- 19:05, 5 January 2011 diff hist +157 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: minor redraft: tense edit, tighter wording, expanded acronyms, Roko left LW not SIAI. Reply to Armondikov
- 18:43, 5 January 2011 diff hist +521 Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 05:22, 5 January 2011 diff hist -299 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: shorter == better
- 04:19, 5 January 2011 diff hist +2,164 Talk:LessWrong →Hell: first draft of a simple+NPOV description of the LW censorship
- 19:54, 4 January 2011 diff hist +146 m LessWrong No response re: what you felt was wrong with this draft?
- 17:13, 4 January 2011 diff hist +146 LessWrong please critique the content, not my character
- 17:09, 4 January 2011 diff hist +836 Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 03:21, 4 January 2011 diff hist +147 LessWrong Undo revision 707995 by David Gerard (talk) -- see talk page
- 03:20, 4 January 2011 diff hist +327 Talk:LessWrong →Hell
- 14:38, 3 January 2011 diff hist -43 LessWrong →The ugly: Hopefully we can all agree that this is both easily understood, and belongs in "the ugly" section :)
- 14:36, 3 January 2011 diff hist +190 LessWrong →The ugly
- 14:08, 2 January 2011 diff hist +21 N User:Waitingforgodel Created page with 'make my links blue :)' current
- 13:51, 2 January 2011 diff hist -924 LessWrong Undo revision 706717 by David Gerard (talk) - This version is more understandable. I did a mini study of it. It also has new info
- 04:11, 1 January 2011 diff hist +182 LessWrong →The ugly
- 03:22, 1 January 2011 diff hist -4 m LessWrong →The ugly
- 03:19, 1 January 2011 diff hist -1,102 LessWrong →The ugly: Seems to have been rewritten as "what less informed people would consider to be ugly" by a LWer. Fixed. If we want to go deep into the back story let's make it a separate section.
- 03:15, 4 November 2010 diff hist 0 m LessWrong Old LW google cache was broken, uploaded a new copy to same website and updated link here