There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Addicted to Hate
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Does this count as a book? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Wrap into Phelps page?[edit]
Since this is so short, and people probably don't know it exists, do you think it would be more effective to wrap it into Fred phelp's page, and make a redirect to teh title? GodotEn live 15:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think it should be a subsection of the Phelps page, but a lot of it can be (and has been) slapped into the abuse section. A little more tinkering, and I think it'll be okay to let this page become a redirect to that section. On a similar note, would anybody support WBC getting its own page? There are many links to it, but it goes straight to Fred. Polite Timesplitter talk to me sugar, but best keep it on thedown-low 09:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)