There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Aphorism
Are all those quotes really associated with obama & McSame?--En attendant Godot"«I don't think in any language. I think in images. V.Nabokov» 22:00, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- Don't think so.
ContribsTalk 22:04, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- Think they're just to illustrate the contraryness of aphorisms.
ContribsTalk 22:05, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- Ok, let's say that then. :-) --
En attendant Godot"«I don't think in any language. I think in images. V.Nabokov» 22:06, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- Ok, let's say that then. :-) --
- Think they're just to illustrate the contraryness of aphorisms.
It was a little aphorism humor. AR-AR! Teresita 22:09, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- No, i liked it. :-) I just clarified, then added snark. not sure if the last two really are aphorisms--
En attendant Godot"«I don't think in any language. I think in images. V.Nabokov» 22:15, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
- No, i liked it. :-) I just clarified, then added snark. not sure if the last two really are aphorisms--
Fun:[edit]
I think this deserves to be in the Fun namespace. No actual content. Benn (talk) 21:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)