Talk:Argumentum

Don't like these categories. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 01:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Why did we not have a cat for websites before, by which I mean it is an obvious cat so what is our reason for not having it? - π 02:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

It's the "argumentation" tag I find strange on the cat. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

This article reads like fancruft crap, lets trash it a bit. - π 02:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, we will, we will! ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Seems to be less than a month old and (surprise) America-centric. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Can't find any on-site note of who runs it but Publius is a name used throughout for anonymity. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Burn as an elaborate form of spam? - π 02:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Linkspam attempt? Give it a couple of days? ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

The website looks like it has about 4 users, there is not much worth having an article on really. - π 02:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Agree, but I like the idea of it. Burn? ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

We can always resurrect if we need it, so burn. - π 02:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

So mote it be. He (?) might talk to someone before trying it again. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 02:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)