RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2951Goal: $5000

Talk:Atom

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Did someone delete the articles on elements and the periodic table because I can very specifically remember editing them but can't find them or create links. Armondikov 09:39, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

There are some at Category:Elements but those I looked for (namely zinc, boron, nitrogen, lithium and radium) haven't been deleted. Are you sure you edited them here at RW? NightFlarei haz a talk page. 10:12, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
Ah ha! Found what went wrong. Elements/periodic table is under category:elements rather than a mainspace page... That should really be altered. Armondikov 10:37, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
I edited NF's comment to link to the category (images work the same way). ħumanUser talk:Human 21:14, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

Aha[edit]

Atoms are defiantly the irreducably complex components of nature. If you take them apart, they no longer work right, meaning they've must been intelligently designed well enough to produce even more complex structures. --Sigma 7 (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)