|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Atom
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This physics related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
|
| ||||
Did someone delete the articles on elements and the periodic table because I can very specifically remember editing them but can't find them or create links. Armondikov 09:39, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- There are some at Category:Elements but those I looked for (namely zinc, boron, nitrogen, lithium and radium) haven't been deleted. Are you sure you edited them here at RW? NightFlarei haz a talk page. 10:12, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- Ah ha! Found what went wrong. Elements/periodic table is under category:elements rather than a mainspace page... That should really be altered. Armondikov 10:37, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- I edited NF's comment to link to the category (images work the same way). ħuman
21:14, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- I edited NF's comment to link to the category (images work the same way). ħuman
- Ah ha! Found what went wrong. Elements/periodic table is under category:elements rather than a mainspace page... That should really be altered. Armondikov 10:37, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
Aha[edit]
Atoms are defiantly the irreducably complex components of nature. If you take them apart, they no longer work right, meaning they've must been intelligently designed well enough to produce even more complex structures. --Sigma 7 (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)