There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Autodynamics
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Are we refuting 70 year old crank ideas now? ħuman 04:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep in mind that creation science is a few hundred years old. This one still exists. More important than Time Cube. --
16:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Um, time cube isn't "important" at all, except that it's funny. Anyway, can the article make it clear that the movement or whatever it is still exists (other than a link to a site that wouldn't load while I waited last night)? ħuman
19:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Um, time cube isn't "important" at all, except that it's funny. Anyway, can the article make it clear that the movement or whatever it is still exists (other than a link to a site that wouldn't load while I waited last night)? ħuman