RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2200Goal: $3000

Talk:Baruch Spinoza

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon philosophy.svg

This Philosophy related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


From an Editor's edit comment "Ethical philosophy - some more re-redding, this one seems quite bad for it.)" My snarky reply - duh, it's spinoza! you expect it to make sense?????????????????--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Her intense and pure religiousness took the form of her having equal faith in the existence of another world and in the impossibility of comprehending it in terms of earthly life. V.Nabokov» 17:08, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Spinoza bagels[edit]

I saw them for sale at Trader Joe's. Not the best-tasting. Don't think they even got Spinoza's picture right. --Thomas Wright Sulcer (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

They'll bagel your mind! Or something like that. But I agree they don't taste very good. -- (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Marketers are exploiting an image of Spinoza as a smart man of the Jewish persuasion, but realize that most people have no clue what Spinoza thought but, so what, let's stick a Spinoza-look alike face on a plastic bag to sell mediocre bagels. Sheesh.--Thomas Wright Sulcer (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Spinoza on morality[edit]

I've been writing my dissertation on Spinoza for the last year. Just to make it clear...he is no relativist. The best term to describe Spinoza would be that of an amoralist. See the referenced chapter in the 'Short Treatise' on what good and evil are. -- (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Understanding rather than ridiculing, bewailing, and scorning[edit]

It seems like RationalWiki has explicitly rejected Spinoza's approach, "I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them." Landmartian (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)