There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Bruce Siegel
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Please delete this article, the information is wrong. Bruce (talk) 02:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It seems to be extensively sourced to your own writings, if you are in fact Bruce Siegel. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- As much as I'd love to contradict some crank BoN, this is actually an article that should be deleted, according to the notability criteria discussion at the Saloon Bar. This guy's a nobody. No one cares about him, and he has no impact on the world. He's less of a stain on humanity than the guy behind Time Cube. Having an article about him here just lowers the quality of the wiki, and drags us down to flaming petty loons and frauds.--"Shut up, Brx." 02:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see how having articles about itinerant cranks "lowers the quality of the wiki". ħuman
03:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see how having articles about itinerant cranks "lowers the quality of the wiki". ħuman
- As much as I'd love to contradict some crank BoN, this is actually an article that should be deleted, according to the notability criteria discussion at the Saloon Bar. This guy's a nobody. No one cares about him, and he has no impact on the world. He's less of a stain on humanity than the guy behind Time Cube. Having an article about him here just lowers the quality of the wiki, and drags us down to flaming petty loons and frauds.--"Shut up, Brx." 02:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)