Talk:Christina Eline Ellingsen

This article contains unverifiable accusations and inaccurate misinformation about living persons and organisations. The article is also recycling unverifiable claims from other articles.

There are desperate attempts to link this person to right-wing extremism, which would in any case be inaccurate, but which appears especially comical because the links are simply ridiculous. She reposted a post written by a man with a anti-semittic, holocaust-denying pineapple? So she is right-wing, and a random man holding a holocaust-denying pineapple is proof?

The section about the police report is thoroughly inaccurate, as the references would show if the editor had read them. WHRC has never accused anyone of pedophilia, and neither has this person. They are criticising a paragraph in the Women's caucus feminist declaration, which included a paragraph demanding the decriminalisation of adolescent sexual autonomy. The phrasing of the claim would necessarily include the lowering of age of consent. When WHRC asked the norwegian chapter of ILGA (International lesbian and gay association) if they agreed with this demand, or if they would denounce it, they responded by reporting the spokesperson for WHRC to the police for "wreckless behaviour". The police dismissed the case immediately.

The accusations that WHRC is an "extremist transphobic hate organisation", the portrayal of posie parker as a white supremacists, and the framing of Ellingsen as a white supremacists transphobe extremist - whilst simultaneously framing her as having ties with maoist media publishers AND wesboto baptist church gay bashing anti-abortion fanatics -Regardless of the fact that the person in this article is mostly insignificant - what the hell is going on with the editors on this site?

Do they not understand what extremism is? An extremist is someone who will stop at nothing. We know what this means in Norway, we have a mass-murdering extremist in our prisons. To equate women who states that women need sex-based provisions in law with extremists, is simply insane.

In line with the desperate attempts to tie women to genocide-sympathetic, right-wing maoist holocaust-deniying extremism, it is claimed several places that WHRC actively wants to "eliminate trans people". I doubt it is possible, but this claim needs to be verified. If it cannot be verified, it has to be removed.

It is also claimed that WHRC is actively working to remove trans rights. This also needs to be verified. The campaign is inviting individuals and organisations to adhere to the UN convention on the elimination of all forms of violence and discrimination against women, which states in article 1 that discrimination against women is defined as discrimination on the basis of sex. As far as I know, there is nothing defined as "trans rights", and it is very difficult to actively work to remove something that does not exist. WHRC is not concerned with "trans rights" whatsoever, they are concerned with 9 areas of existing sex-based rights for women and children, which will be impacted if they are replaced with the very different quantity "gender identity".

Women have every right to organise over their existing sex-based rights without being presented as engaging in genocide. ^{— Unsigned, by: Cellular / talk / contribs}