Talk:Creation science/Archive1
Merge proposal[edit]
A stub which just links a few articles together.
- Consider merging with Creationism162.82.215.199 15:58, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
What happened to the long talk page that used to be attached to Creation science? Especially the discussion over using the quote marks in the title? Or was that on a slightly differently titled article? ħuman
20:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, my confusion, that was at Creation Museum. Nevermind... maybe we should drop the quotes here, again, just due to the redirect issue... ħuman 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, drop them from the title. They aren't used in the text beyond the first line. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 20:23, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, drop them from the title. They aren't used in the text beyond the first line. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
You guys will love this, it's RIGHT off of Conservapedia.. they admit that they intend to lie right in the first sentence: http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/6981/creationscience.png -CenaxKikia
Vatican hijacking science?[edit]
Basically, this article is the Vatican claiming the big bang is inline with the Christian Creation Myth. I thought it should be included, and figured this would be the article for it, but wanted to run it by some other folks first. --Logic and Empricism 18:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Apologies...[edit]
... to the upstanding citizen Ham, whom I mistook for Hovind. And sincere apologies to Proxima Centauri. --larron (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)