There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Darwin's Predictions
Might we be able to find someone who has the time and expertise to actually address the arguments he presents in the sections other than 1? — Unsigned, by: 72.81.235.196 / talk / contribs
Hilarious[edit]
This is hilarious. "Nothing to rebut"? You mean nothing you CAN rebut. That's two entirely different things. Then falsely claim that he doesn't list evolution's false predictions when he in fact does in expanded form. But the sections after the introduction on this page that are supposed to address the false predictions is... EMPTY. Yeah don't look at what we don't want to see. I can't stop laughing at this.— Unsigned, by: 41.151.246.120 / talk / contribs
- This page was started in 2009 and there hasn't been any significant work on it since. Most likely, the original author got bored or realised that it would take more of their time than they would spare for such a thing.--ZooGuard (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Uh-huh. :)
I gotta say.. I quite enjoyed the thorough trouncing of the INTRO that you contributed.. next, how about you deal with the actual material.