Talk:David Brooks

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

I feel like this article is very unfair to David Brooks. Just for starters he Isn't a crazy dogmatic true believer. He's flexable. He's admitted some of the things he said that are quoted here where stupid. read paragraphs three and four you can see he feels the one nation slightly devided article was bad. or read this page for details on how he isn't dogmatic. Or read the whole article I think it represents david brooks loads better then what we have here on rational wiki right now. summary: hey I like David Brooks--NonPerson (talk) 01:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

We don't accuse him of being "dogmatic", we accuse him of being a VSP, which he is. Nobodies calling him an extreme right-winger though.ClothCoat (talk) 03:14, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

((person)) If one goes to a talk by Brooks, one will probably hear a story about how the late William F Buckley took a liking to Brooks, and kind of took him "under his wings." That seems to be a fairly big deal for Brooks, and, as things have progressed, it seems possibly true that Brooks feels a certain responsibility for being one of the major "maintainers" of the "William F Buckley tradition" (which Brooks seems very impressed with). Too me, it is somewhat unclear how all of this affects what Brooks writes today, but I think it is something to be aware of whenever one reads a Brooks article. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs