2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Dialectics

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

So I started writing this, thinking it was "dialogics", which I used in my phd thesis, and realized "no fool, far more basic - socrates and everything." So please review this, cause all i did was read several web-texts on it, and summarize. I *think* we studied it, once, a million years ago in my into to phil course, but i was 5 then, and i'm like 90 now.Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 18:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

This article needs moar Hegel bashing[edit]

Here's why. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)