There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Energy
Being as concerned about mortality as any human, can you please provide more detail on why energy can't be conscious? Thanks in advance. Unknown (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Because energy isn't a thing, it's a measure of work done? Sophiebecause liberals 10:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The page doesn't say energy can't be conscious, it says consciousness isn't energy. Various sci-fi authors have played with the concept of conscious energy: from Douglas Adams' Hooloovoo (superintelligent shades of the colour blue) in HHGTTG through to Arthur C Clarke's monolith builders' final state in 2001. That's very different from the sort of new age bullshytt the article is discussing, though. TerrenceKoeckring (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Added references[edit]
I added some references. Are they any good? Are they enough? If they are enough, can we take down the "references needed" template? Also added a section about work and it's connection to energy. I'd love some feedback. — Unsigned, by: SuperDude / talk / contribs 20:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)