|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Fahrenheit 9/11
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Um... This is not a very good page. EVDebs (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- Apart from its being a stub, what is wrong with it? It's all true. ħuman
00:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I thought I'd just leave a quick talk comment. It may seem cynical, but yes, it seems that most of the film's positive reception comes because it's just fashionable to bash Bush repeatedly. Now, I think he was one of the dumber presidents and certainly never agreed with or to anything he did, but I can see that personality cults work in both directions - and many, if not most, of his supporters and detractors were both equally as guilty of mindlessly holding their positions and needlessly fellating each other regardless of what crap spewed out of their mouths. 
sshole 09:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hence the very sarcastic nature of the article. I've tried to watch the film several times, and it is not his best work by a long shot. Might be his worst. It is interminable and boring, but yet was sold out at the theaters back in the fall of 2004. ħuman 09:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hence the very sarcastic nature of the article. I've tried to watch the film several times, and it is not his best work by a long shot. Might be his worst. It is interminable and boring, but yet was sold out at the theaters back in the fall of 2004. ħuman