There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
The importance of incentives
Does anyone question that most people are motivated more strongly by incentives than by high ideals? Granted, there is some behavior that is hard to explain, such as people's willingness to vote in elections, when such behavior is clearly irrational from the standpoint of personal economics (see w:paradox of voting). But it's hard to deny that rational ignorance is rampant in our society. Tisane (talk) 18:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- So your argument hinges on "Open your mind, it's as clear as 2+2=4." P-Foster (talk) 18:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Originally I was going to title that post "This seems obvious, but..." However, I decided to tone it down. Anyway, someone did put a fact tag on it, so I was wondering whether there is actually disagreement on that point, or whether someone just wanted to make sure a source was cited. Tisane (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Let me
Intellectual dishonesty and logical fallacies
Not every logical fallacy is necessarily presented out of intellectual dishonesty; sometimes people just aren't very good at being rational, and they fail to see that they're making a fallacious argument. Tisane (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)