Talk:Joss Whedon

wait...

Didn't this just get nuked? --Revolverman (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

For copying from wikipedia, I re-wrote it.--Andrewstewart1 (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

(EC) Most of the first draft was unattributed copy-paste from WP. This now looks like OC, but I don't really see why we would need or want an article on this guy. Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 23:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

One of the most prominent atheist literary creators in the contemporary era who has received awards from humanists for humanism? JRCHReason (talk) 00:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

It was on the to-do list, and has some merit. Honestly, I feel a little over-policed of late and feel like it's getting pretty off to be getting this handling. When you see an article that needs improvement, just improve it, don't nuke something because you feel you have the right to negate any discussion.--Andrewstewart1 (talk) 23:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

It's on the to-do list with a rating of -2. Not much of an endorsement. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 23:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

If you want to discuss his views on women, then the current incarnation doesn't really deal with it very well. But other than that there's not much point in the article itself. ^postate 01:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Weaseloid just doesn't like people who lean towards libertarianism and endorse some aspects of a Christian morality system because he's a Red Guard. JRCHReason (talk) 00:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)