Talk:Kishwer Falkner
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
as i understand it we are supposed to be super careful not to libel the subjects of article of living people. dunno about libelous but the majority of this article is false either accident or deliberate lies. it is a none too subtle polemic and hatchet job that disingenuously misrepresents facts to such a degree it overwhelms any valid criticism entirely. its a pretty disgraceful state of affairs for an article whose subject probably does not even warrant their article at present. AMassiveGay (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Compare this to her Wikipedia article. One paragraph stating she was criticised for comments she made one time, vs an entire article dedicated to labelling her a “TERF” who “has made it clear that her main calling in life is in fact opposing the equality and human rights of transgender people”. @CharlotteTakveis focuses a lot on trans issues, and although there’s nothing wrong with that inherently here the end result is an article that has no connection to reality. It calls into question many of her other articles, particularly ones on Norwegian politicians few other RationalWiki editors have heard of. Christopher (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- @CharlotteTakveis seriously stop now. It's looking fucking insaneAMassiveGay (talk) 10:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)