There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Kymatika test
Found this that states only 1-2% of people should have true food intollerances. http://www.aafa.org/display.cfm?id=9&sub=20&cont=286 Not sure if it can go into this article directly or a more general food woo thing. But basically, it appears that people just want to have one to feel different. ArmondikoVsshole 07:00, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- That's just counting allergies, not other intolerances such as lactose intolerance or wheat/gluten intolerances, which I think are slightly more common. ωεαşεζøίɗ
Methinks it is a Weasel 07:07, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- The difference is apparently whether the immune system is active or not. Either way, they're rare, and then again, rarely serious. But it appears that intollerances arae more based on location/ethnicity as you'd breed in certain tollerences to local foods, the most famous being that of alcohol intollerance of east asians. http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/foodintolerance1.shtml I will have to find the entry that accuses most people of just feining them because they just never grew out of childish fussy eating. ArmondikoVsshole 07:16, 17 February 2009 (EST)