Talk:Land Destroyer
Dissection ahoy![edit]
I think the content of the blog is on-mission. I recommend further dissection and analysis of the blogs' contents so we can improve this page and critique what it says. Serocco (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- I would say that the Blog "Land Destroyer" is about as biased as the present RW article about "Land Destroyer".--The soul of the unicorn (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Not Left-Wing[edit]
This is not an authoritarian moonbat blog as it has criticized a regime it didn't like that it thought to be propped up by the West as Communist, just generally anti-American. Contrast this with globalresearch.ca, which could be considered left fringe as it has dipped into North Korea apologism and even Stalin apologism(see this: www.globalresearch.ca/the-rising-tide-of-neo-nazism/5321249). So it should be catagorized as "Centrist Stupidity". There is also no indication that it is left-anarchism or left-liberitarianism either to qualify for "libertarian moonbat" — Unsigned, by: 99.237.142.55 / talk 02:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)