Talk:Michael Egnor

	This Creationism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Kicking ass and taking names. Nice article! ħuman 03:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Would now be a good time to reveal that I am in fact a sockpuppet of Nebuchadnezzar, and that therefore my article on massage was pristinely perfect and required no intervention by senior editors?--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

No, since it wasn't and needed basic copyediting. And what does that have to do with this article? ħuman 04:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

"Senior editors"? ħuman 04:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

(ec)Thank you, my good man. I would have gone into Egnor's arguments further since they cross over into psych/neuroscience, but Novella has so thoroughly demolished them in so many ways so many times (and a lot of them are PRATTs anyway) that I couldn't be arsed, as they say. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. I love a new article that I can't find a single damn typo or grammage thing to fix. ħuman 04:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

An article by him

I recently found an article by Michael Egnor in the godandscience.org website where he presents a clinical case as evidence for mind-brain dualism. There are some things that I don't understand about the article.

• "For example, both dualism and strict materialism predict that severe brain injury will often severely impair mental function." I don't understand why dualism necessarily implies that mental function will be altered.
• The difference between "brain function" and "mental function."
• How an fMRI makes a case for mind-body dualism.

--Jagoe (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)