There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Michael Schmicker
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Percentages[edit]
Would the ratio 98% 'known causes (even if requiring a bit of work to analyse) to 2% 'presently one-offs, insufficient data and incomplete information etc' be a reasonable one? Anna Livia (talk) 14:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)