Talk:Mike Malloy

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

The section on MM in the liberal talk radio is already better than this. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't sure which way people wanted to go with this one, so that is why the initial article was so vague.The Goonie 1 (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
So is the crap I wrote at Goonie's sandbox:

Mike Malloy is a batshit insane liberal radio commentator on current events. He is a gun-totin', atheist, 9-11 conspiracy theorist promotin', young woman marryin' father of grownups and little Molly, resident of the fine Georgian city of Atlanta.

He came to broad attention in 200X when Air America Radio put his show on after Janeane and Sam in the 9-12 PM EST slot. When they ditched him he scrambled to keep his fine self on the air via the fledgling and now defunct NOVA M radio. Currently, he and his fine young wife Kathy, his producer, run the show out of his basement and he is featured on a handful of actual real radio stations.

He wants Glenn Beck to commit suicide.

Now to figure out how to integrate it! ħumanUser talk:Human 04:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

What the fuck? an Ed poor-style writing assignment? Get Stuffed. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Huh? First you compliment my writing (at LTR), then you fuck me off? Anyway, I already done did it. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposition[edit]

I have noticed an inconsistency on this site concerning Mike Malloy and being new I was unsure where else to bring this up. Having not listened to him myself I have no opinion; but, on this website the liberal talk radio section seems to praise him while his specific page is very critical. I leave it to the rest of you who are familiar to solve this issue. — Unsigned, by: Thearm / talk / contribs

I think, given that he's a moonbat, the liberal talk radio page should be updated to more reflect the tone of the main article, not the other way around. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 22:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)