Talk:Phil Gramm

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Icon politics USA.svg

This United States politics related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

Seeing as this article ends up talking about the current US banking crisis, is it worth having an article about Neocon culpability in it? Totnesmartin 06:32, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

This article is riddled with inaccuracies and unsourced assertions. The simple fact is that none of the banks that failed merged as was allowed with Gramm-Leach-Bliley which was signed by Bill Clinton. ConservapediaEditor (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I like Phil[edit]

With such a long and bloody history I thought Phil would be a good subject for my first edit, first pass, first try...give it to me straight. I decided to quit after the Enron bit...it could use a bit more. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 00:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)