2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Philosophy of science

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Recommended reading?[edit]

Would it be a good idea to include a 'recommended reading' section with a few books that are somewhat broad in their approach to Philosophy of Science (ie, an intro book, not something used in a PhD program)? I would do it myself, but I don't know anything past what's on wikipedia.--Logic and Empricism (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Sure. Тysic semper 00:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
My book when I eventually get around to writing it. Obviously. Scarlet A.pngmoral 00:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I will do so, this seems like a great idea. Philosophy of science is one of my areas of academic specialization. PhiloFox (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

The quote[edit]

Why you being wiseguy with dick feynman? --Journeyman Studios (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)