User talk:Hamilton

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Hamilton!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the most rational of wikis (not that that's saying much). Peter Monomorium antarcticum 04:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please sign talk page entries using four tildes like this: ~~~~ or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png, on the toolbar above the edit panel. Thank you. TyAnnoy 16:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Nice edit to the Objectivism article :D ТyYAUA 21:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Please don't delete material from your talk page.[edit]

Learn how archiving works. Hugs and kisses. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 09:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

It's in Archive1 already. Peter mqzp 09:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for paying attention jackass.--Token Conservative (talk) 16:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

If you're going to slowly delete the wiki[edit]

At least pick up the trash you create in the process. Hugs and kisses, Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 16:22, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

It didn't seem worth it when some galant reactionary was going to undo any attempt at improving the site.--Token Conservative (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


how bout that Stothert--MikallakiM 14:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I live in Bellevue. Don't pay much attention to Omaha politics. I do know there's a someone-or-other Merica running for OPS schoolboard though.--Token Conservative (talk) 15:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Not living in OPS, i don't pay much attention to OPS politics :P i didnt even bother voting. --MikallakiM 15:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
All I know is, hilarious name--Token Conservative (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Recipe space.[edit]

Has been a part of RW since 2007. Thus deleting the shrimp article was not a smart thing to do. Maybe you can stop being a giant noob for a day or so and let the grown-ups run the wiki. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 15:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

And that means it's somehow ontopic because...--Token Conservative (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Because it is. It's recipe space, for Christ's sake. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 20:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Recipespace is community building. It goes in fits and spurts. I am going to freak the fuck out on your if you keep messing with it. Don't be a noob. Learn our culture before you make unwarranted assumptions. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 21:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
And what, pray tell, would "freak the fuck out" be?--Token Conservative (talk) 21:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Resist the temptation to be yourself and avoid unnecessary conflict. That's good advice. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 21:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
"Myself" is trying to make this website not a shithole. If we're going for shithole, it would be nice to let me know so I can help with that.--Token Conservative (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm wondering how you figure picking fights with users with several years' worth of experience on the site, a disregard for tradition, a unilateral approach to an inherently collective venture, acting like you think you're the smartest kid in the class, and generally being annoying, humourless and boring brings you closer to your goal. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 21:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
And I wonder why you think being here for longer than me makes recipe space somehow a good use of site resources.--Token Conservative (talk) 22:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Fuck with the recipes and we will fuck with you, clueless noob. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
If you think we shouldn't have a recipe space, start a discussion about it in the SB or forum and look for some community feedback before you take any action. Deleting a recipe page (especially a quality one) without seeking any input & getting self-righteous when challenged on it isn't a good way forward. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I didn't know we had a recipe space. Seriously, wtf?--Token Conservative (talk) 22:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
There's obviously a lot that you don't know. That's okay. Why don't you take a cue from your intellectual touchstone and show a little respect for the institutional and social structures that predate your arrival on the scene instead of lashing out like a reckless Jacobin. Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 23:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop using rollback[edit]

If you are undoing good faith edits rather than vandalism, you need to show your working by including an edit summary to make it clear why you are reverting. It really isn't clear to anyone, for example, why you would want to capitalise "Calorie", which isn't a proper noun, & keep undoing attempts to correct this. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Because in the context of the LCD article, it is "Calorie" not "calorie". Big-C Calorie is a dietary calories that has 1,000 little-c calorie. If you want, I can include that in the article, but it is a Big-C.--Token Conservative (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Kcal, moron. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't think Weaseloid was necessarily doubting that you were right to revert to capital C, just that as a matter of courtesy it is better to give a quick summary of why you are making the revert in the edit summary. Otherwise nobody knows why you have done what you have done. DamoHi 00:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Carbshark is basically a vandal. I don't see why I need to justify reverting his edits.--Token Conservative (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
So you are basically an asshole. Nice work with impressing me with your (not) brains! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
So you say. You need to justify them because that tends to be how things work around here. Again -- respect for tradition/procedure/established practices isn't a bad thing for the new guy to keep in mind. Faced with mysteries dark and vast/statements just seem vain at last. 00:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
He's been here for more than a year, and made many a decent contribution, so hardly the new guy. However we must:
"Remember: unfunny vandalism is often committed by those lacking elementary interpersonal skills, often with a mental age considerably less than their physical age, and such persons should be pitied rather than censured. They are unable to make any meaningful contribution to society and are reduced to attempting to destroy the works of their betters. Do not be harsh; rather invite them to make meaningful contributions. (unless they're totally beyond the pale, in which case marmalise them!)" Tielec01 (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
He's been here for a year, but he keeps making bush-league edits that people need to correct him on, so he may as well be a new guy for all the guidance he seems to require. Faced with mysteries dark and vast/statements just seem vain at last. 00:37, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I can't find any sources that support 'calorie' being capitalised. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah, found at WP:capitonym: "A practice advocated by some, and not widely followed." I don't see any reason to adopt this non-standard usage. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

My chemistry textbook says dietary calories are written as k/cal or Calorie. That's what I've been going with.--Token Conservative (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Why do you claim to be conservative?[edit]

I'm genuinely curious. Don't get all touchy and bitchy like you always do, just answer the fucking question. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Why did you react like a little bitch when I asked you the above question? God, you're such a little dufus. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

so 2, overused meme here[edit]

How bout that weather, --MikallakiM 21:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I slept through it all, actually. 12 hours of sleep was freaking amazing. I'm not much fun to make small talk with, sorry.--Token Conservative (talk) 21:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
bleh, ive already asked other people :P I had just gotten home from a party when it hit, so fun times there. --MikallakiM 21:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
So, what are you up to?--Token Conservative (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
About to go watch The Thing, actually. Friend gave me a copy of it yesterday. Also go figure out how the hell i eat whatseft of a cookie cake i bought for a tea party. --MikallakiM 21:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You went to a tea party? o.O--Token Conservative (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Was a homestuck meetup; friend had messed up the cookie cake she had gotten so asked me if i could buy another one and get it over to her, then she said i might as well come to the event. also she didnt want to walk over to Elmwood in a "lolita-lite" cosplay outfit.--MikallakiM 21:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Ah. The whole "at a tea party" thing kind of threw me. You don't exactly seem like the kind of person to sip tea and eat crumpets or whatever.--Token Conservative (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
"The amount of things you dont know about me would write a medium sized, mostly boring book". i did have some Tea. mostly we just sat around at one of the things and talked. --MikallakiM 21:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
It's called "stereotyping" Mikal. Don't ruin my fun with your snark or knowledge of your own life.--Token Conservative (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Pfft. --MikallakiM 21:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

300 year blocks[edit]

Stop doing that. You don't have any authority. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

This little bitch is going to be a problem. He doesn't appreciate this site's culture, its glorious past. He is a child of Foster the Cruel's tyrannical whims. He is a monster who ought to be castrated. He can't even answer a basic question without going off on a little hissy fit, just like Foster, Gremlin et all. Next thing he'll be threatening to leave and never come back. What a cunt. MarcusCicero (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
This site is going to be dead in three years if it's lucky. I kind of plan on enjoying watching the diseased whore die, as a matter of fact.--Token Conservative (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
You are obviously our most honored editor. Not. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Why is the jackass who suggested this idiocy criticizing the people who agreed with him?[edit]

Do you have aspergers? MarcusCicero (talk) 13:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I'd ban you for being an ableist **** if I could. Vergeltung (talk) 05:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Help a conservative brother/sister out[edit]

RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Promotion_and_ban_by_Mikal Vergeltung (talk) 05:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

It was me. Could I please get redemoted? For one thing, there's IP blocks that are a problem that require sysop to ignore. The reason I lost it is because Mikal had a fit when I told him how improper it is to insult Autistic users by calling them "not normal" and that sort of thing. Help a conservative brother/sister out? –Александр(а) Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 22:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. –Александр(а) Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 04:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Meh--Token Conservative (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

This discussion was moved to User:Inquisitor Ehrenstein/Moved discussion from User talk:Hamilton.

Please look at Talk:Reddit.[edit]

I added something to Talk:Reddit.—Chbarts (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

My problem with SRS[edit]

They bully people to the point of making them want to commit suicide, and then defend it: (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Fuck off troll.--Token Conservative (talk) 18:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I am engaging honestly. I simply disagree with you on this subject.—Chbarts (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi there[edit]

Hi Hamilton. I'm a mod now. You ought to treat me with respect. Laters. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


Александр(а) (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 07:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Blunt Force Drama[edit]

Just a heads up: I notice you made him a sysop, but then added auto-patrolled status. You didn't de-sysop, him, though, which I think is not what you meant to do! Kimberly (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

No, I meant to make him a sysop--Token Conservative (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Remove libel content off Page[edit]

over 75% of this page is libel - and needs to be removed. Before I have an attorney remove it for you and possibly sue the Website, remove what I deem inappropriate at the page named Kevin Martin. First, my name for SEO purposes is not tolerated for libel or harassment. Images are not to be posted without my permission. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

This isn't the responsibility of an individual site user. I suggest opening a dialogue on the relevant talk page (here) about what aspects of the article you are objecting to. If you want to discuss legal threats, please first consult our Legal FAQ page, which includes the relevant guidance and contact details. Thanks. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Additionally: come make me--Token Conservative (talk) 18:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Crimen sollicitationis revert[edit]

I turned the big block quotes into references because they didn't fit in the running text of the article, and their tone seemed a bit off, as well. I used the sources to improve the article, rather than using the article to showcase the quotes. Is that unreasonable? (On a different note, I included some miscellaneous improvements, please don't revert whole-sale if you disagree with specific parts of an edit.) Kimberly (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


Hi, Hamilton, can you explain why you deleted my criticisms of the irrationality of EV Debs assertion: "Although many libertarians and anarchists have attempted to equate the two, statism and authoritarianism are not the same thing; although most authoritarians (especially of the right-wing type) are statists, so are quite a lot of people who believe one of the functions of government is to enforce civil rights."

As I have pointed out, this is merely an assertion, and it is pretty much a platitude with no rational substance to it. Why do you allow such an irrational statement, yet edit out my objective and rational criticism of it?StopTheViolence (talk) 23:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)StopTheViolence

Because you're an idiot.-- Token Conservative/ Feminist Bouncer 01:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


Stop blocking people because you don't like them. It is inimical to our long term interests. Read the help page on blocking and re-acquaint yourself with our community standards. Remember that you too are relying on our indulgence of your annoying behaviour - extend the same courtesy to others. Tielec01 (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

No kidding. I had to unblock a guy who did nothing other than post some comments in the talk page of an article. This place has a serious case of groupthink as it is without blocking on sight anyone who disagrees slightly. --DamoHi 05:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't be such a Social Justice Warrior[edit]

Not mostly my work BTW. If techs had the ability to unblock themselves, I wouldn't be revoking your sysop rights, but Weaseloid had to do it, so you lost them. I should also point out that it's not a user I've had great interactions with, so him taking my side should show how much you fucked up. Secondly, it's hardly "transphobic" to make fun of the "arbitrary social construct" woo that so many social justice warriors and armchair activists spout as pseudo anthropologists and social psychologists. Guess what, driving on the right is an "arbitrary social construct," so if you think that conformity for the sake of conformity is bad, than obviously you don't think that people should be driving on the correct side of the road, staying in a single lane, or stopping at red lights is wrong. Grow up. No one is going to hate trans people because they read an article about being transdirectional. It would be like me saying that people seeing Swastikas in Medal of Honor will cause people to become Nazis. For the record, the German government believes that and I think that they're massively stupid for it. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 20:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Eat shit and die-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 21:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
+1 Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 22:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't say die, but if I saw Ehrenstein about to start digging into a giant bowl of feces I might pause to consider how much I should let them eat before I see if they need to be committed for their own safety. --Shadow of Lords talk 23:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


User makes a disgusting Transphobic remark. Another user deletes it and blocks the offending user. Undo the punishment of the Transphobe, punish the punisher.

And you pieces of shit wonder why I hate you? Fuck all of you.-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 21:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Block of Ehrensteinhfhg whatever the hell his name is[edit]

While I understand your upset, surely you realize that you yourself cannot be the punishment tribunal for anyone you think has said something offensive. I am sure that if you thought for a moment, you could think of someone you have offended here, even though they were being oversensitive and silly. And just like that person couldn't block you at their whim, likewise you have to Coop someone who's being so offensive that you feel they must be blocked from the site. I hope you see the wisdom of that policy here, even if your anger might have temporarily overcome you.

On a side note, I'd also like to point out that it's a little unjust for you to heap scorn on RW for his own vengeance block of you, which lasted all of ten minutes before being overturned.--ADtalkModerator 23:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Actually, it hasn't been overturned. I'm confined to my talkpage. And until someone does something about that pile of shit I feel pretty justified in pointing out how incredibly of an administration policy it is to punish people who punish people who break the fucking rules.-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 23:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
20:55, 5 September 2013 AMassiveGay (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked Hamilton (Talk | contribs) (seemed very petty)
But I will unblock you again just to be sure. Your IP was still blocked, and that's undone too.
Obviously, that would be just have been an oversight.--ADtalkModerator 00:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
AMG unblocked my account, not my IP. Point remains though: I'm confined to my talkpage. And until someone does something about that pile of shit I feel pretty justified in pointing out how incredibly of an administration policy it is to punish people who punish people who break the fucking rules-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 00:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
So climb down off your high horse and take him to the Coop. If what he did was so terrible and vicious, then people will agree with you, right? I know it may be more satisfying to burn in righteous anger and do nothing, but it hardly puts you on the moral high ground of judgment over RW if you haven't even bothered to speak out.
Yes, your IP was still blocked. Clearly an oversight when you were unblocked.--ADtalkModerator 00:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, I couldn't do anything other than bitch on my userpage until 15 minutes ago and since I'm still not a sysop, I'm still being punished.-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 00:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Weasaloid seems to have taken away your banhammer because of your most recent abuses of it, the one I mentioned here and your 3-month ban of StopTheViolence. I'm not sure I don't agree with him... can you be trusted not to slap a 3-month ban on the next person who irritates you?
Someone will probably give you back your hammer, don't worry. But not me.--ADtalkModerator 00:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Well to be fair this promotion should be raised in the coop as per our community standards so we can vote on whether it is a reasonable reaction to Hamilton's inability to control his trigger finger. Tielec01 (talk) 00:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
I guess technically, but in terms of promotion and demotion, I have always found it best to let them work themselves out. Except in extreme cases, people worthy of a hammer usually get one handed to them by one of our many other sysops... and people who abuse it usually have to endure a while without one, and maybe learn something. I'd only take it to the Coop if I thought he should permanently lose it (i.e. should be put in sysoprevoke).--ADtalkModerator 00:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
I'd just like to take a minute to bask in some diabolical glee over our resident English teacher typing "your" instead of "you're." That same kind of joy Chillingsworth felt when he discovered the mark on Reverend Dimmesdale's chest in The Scarlet Letter--"Shut up, Brx." 00:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
OH SWEET GOD NO. And here I just gave a grammar test today. I hang my head in shame.--ADtalkModerator 00:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
C'mon, man, you coulda sashayed your way out of that one easily. I understand his upset, but I don't understand your shame. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Indeed! Whew.--ADtalkModerator 00:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
(EC) WAIT A SECOND I didn't make a mistake!--ADtalkModerator 00:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
But wouldn't you need to use a semi-colon for that sentence to make sense, then?--"Shut up, Brx." 00:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
No. While I understand everyone's desire to be right, there is no cosmic balance at risk here. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm only teasing--"Shut up, Brx." 00:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Goddamn it, get the fuck off my talkpage-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 00:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
lol, are the orange/yellow notification boxes getting to you? (hopefully he doesn't have email notification on...)--"Shut up, Brx." 00:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
A semicolon would make it ungrammatical, since that would turn the first clause into a fragment.--ADtalkModerator 01:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't wanna edit your user page, but[edit]

In a clearly discriminatory and oppressive political motion, Category:Conservatives has been deleted. So if you'd like, you can remove it from your user page. Unless... You like red links? :D --"Shut up, Brx." 00:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


I am sorry if my actions inconvenienced you. I did not realise I had to unblock your IP as well as your account. In my defence I haven't unblocked anyone before and wasn't even sure that I could. AMassiveGay (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Meh, I don't really care. It's more the whole "not a sysop" thing that pisses me off.-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 21:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


I'm considering redemoting you in several days, as long as there are no objections. It seemed like there were other problems, so I'll talk to Weaseloid since he did the promotion. If I do demote you, you need to keep your finger off the trigger, seriously. Your transphobes are my Nazis. I go through the same feelings as you when people gleefully spout off rounds of Nazi propaganda and apologist myths. In fact I'd say it's even more serious because transphobes haven't murdered millions of people and raped millions of women as a tactic of genocide. Yet, I don't go promoting people and dropping long term blocks. If someone as "insane" as me can control myself, than so should you. That is unless you want to admit to being less mature than me.

Anyway, I was going more at poking fun at the "arbitrary social construct" woo that leftists try to use as justification for saying sth is bad. I respect the right of trans people to do what they want. I don't give a shit what they do and they should have the right to do it. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 03:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I swear to god that just yesterday I told you to eat shit and die. I have no idea how that could possible be interprited in any way other than "leave me the fuck alone you stupid piece of transphobic crap".-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 03:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, fine. I won't help you get redemoted. You're being worse with this transphobic thing than I am about Nazis. Congratulations. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 03:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
IE, have you not read what AD posted on your talk page? --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 04:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes. I was offering to help him. Clearly he doesn't want to be demoted again so yes, I'm going to fuck off now. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 04:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
"Help"? You have no more authority than anyone other Sysop in this matter. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 04:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
That is correct and I was going to recommend demoting him and vote in his favor when I discussed it with other sysops or Weaseloid, who made the promotion. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 04:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hamilton wants you off his talkpage, I'm the one who's keeping you here, now. I'll go to your talkpage. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 04:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Turn that frown upside down, box your hate in a crate[edit]

It's one thing to still be butthurt over whatever it was that resulted in you losing your sysopship, but whining on a spambot page is the opposite of being useful. I'm aware of the irony of me saying this, but would you please grow up? You're whiny martydom just ensures you'll be unlikely to be promoted again. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 08:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

(And before you complain, I'm well aware you can't see the edit I linked. That's for the benefit of anyone else who stops by wondering what this is about.) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 08:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there's any chance I'll be demoted anyways. Laziness is the only reason I've just made a new account.-- Token Conservative Feminist Thought Police 16:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

You are jesus on the cross[edit]


Just wanted to say[edit]

I noticed you were complaining that your fight against certain anti psychiatry was going unnoticed. I saw your message on the talk page for Mental illness denial with the anti-psychology crank and her BoN friend.

As someone who has ADD, I just wanted to say thank you. It pisses me off to no end to hear from these idiots spout off total bullshit concerning mental health; especially when public perception on ADD and ADHD is getting bad due to misinformation campaigns from cranks and ideologues. Keep it up!! TokenSkepticMagician talk 20:39, 25 Dec 2013 (UTC)