Talk:Power

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm wondering if we'd be better off discussing "power" in terms of statistics rather than a small stub on politics. Scarlet A.pngmoral 10:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete?[edit]

Kind of innocuous, not a lot of links, and this doesn't really add anything of value, particularly with the lack of citations and some 1.0-style snark that isn't really funny anymore. -- Seth Peck (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah. ТyJFBAA 22:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
No, It could have some potential, without the snark, to back up various other articles64.180.243.158 (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Like the potential a zygote has? As an agile developer, this would be called a "YAGNI"..."You ain't gonna need it." -- Seth Peck (talk) 23:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
This is vacuous fact-free pontificating about one specific interpretation of power as if it's like the only correct one. Get rid of it. WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Move to funspace. Add mention of the Kansas album. Discuss the difference between three phase and single phase, and transmission and distribution. Rinse and repeat. Whatever. Secret Squirrel (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, because those things sound like so much fun. Eyebrow.gif ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Like I said...whatever :" Secret Squirrel (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)