|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:QED
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Should this page maybe be deleted? It's really nothing more than a disambiguation page right now, with neither concept having an article on their own. What say ye? -Smyth 12:30, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
- Nar, leave it as disambi .... (what a word!) Susantalk to me 12:55, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
- ps Both pages do exist Susantalk to me
- Maybee I do "WQED" which is a PBS station in Pgh (pittsburgh) PA.CЯacke® 13:00, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
Second thoughts: blow it up! Susantalk to me 13:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
- Well, I'm not sure I have the powa to blow it up, so I made a little adjustment. What do you think, should it just maybe be made into a redirect? Maybe I'm just being dense, but I can't seem to find an article on quantum electrodynamics. -Smyth 15:26, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Awesome first disambig page! QED, indeed! We rulzorz! human
19:03, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
- Awesome first disambig page! QED, indeed! We rulzorz! human
- Well, I'm not sure I have the powa to blow it up, so I made a little adjustment. What do you think, should it just maybe be made into a redirect? Maybe I'm just being dense, but I can't seem to find an article on quantum electrodynamics. -Smyth 15:26, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Ah, now I discover the Qed link above is a redirect to a redlink. Still, we could have an article on it. Anwyay! We need a template for disambiguation pages that is easy to type and remember, and includes the {{nostub}} template so they don't get tagged by stubbot. The da template does not need any text, although a small box would probably be nice. I suppose I have now cut my work out for me... human 19:07, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
- Whenever one us gets aroudn to writing QED (the other one), this should go back to being a fork. For now, I'm fine with the redirect. human 18:12, 29 November 2007 (EST)