2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Talk:Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cant find any negative reviews for this one but it clearly is not science, can we just put on the article it is pseudoscience?? Or do we need a review?? DinoCrisis (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, that would be okay. Theory of Practice "the standards of the site are ultimately an expression of the community makeup, and not a set of rules or policies." 21:26, 22 July 2012 (UTC)