There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cant find any negative reviews for this one but it clearly is not science, can we just put on the article it is pseudoscience?? Or do we need a review?? DinoCrisis (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)