Talk:School

So what is "home schooled"? Does it have anything to do with incest? DocSock

Doc, in the YEConservaloonative version, it has everything to do with incest. No goats are involved, however, so quit drooling. human^{be in} 21:47, 29 May 2007 (CDT)

Damn.DocSock 21:50, 29 May 2007 (CDT)

Subhuman go to cave school. It like homescholl but learn more.--Subhuman cabal member 15:37, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

For a good example of the second usage of "school", observe how Sevenstring schools RobS. How's he managed to keep from being banned for so long? --Kels 22:38, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Quoth

Conservapedia on School

The third sentence on the Conservapedia "School" article;

As of 1995 in the United States of America, 89% of children attend taxpayer-funded atheistic schools that censor classroom prayer.

Hey thank God, eh? CЯacke® 00:48, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Hehe, yeah, they all gradiated by now and rulz the world! Christians, be scared, we are gonna kill Kristmass!!!! human 00:52, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Nom for deletion.

I'm nominating this for deletion. Once references to CP are removed, you've got a couple of jokes and absolutely no content beyond the beginning position of knowing what a school is. Sure, we could gut it out and leave it as a stub, but is anybody going to put the time into it? We have a lengthy Homeschooling article, and I just see no reason for this one. ^EXTERMINATE 18:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

If it weren't for the sheer number of things linking here, I'd say go ahead and delete right now. If someone else wants to take care of all those future red links, I'm down to vaporize. On the other hand, this has the potential for having mini-paragraphs on things like classroom prayer, homosexuality "indoctrination" in school, etc., so if someone really wants to come in and make this work, I'm down with that too. Thunderkatz^Ho! 16:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Makes sense. ^moral 16:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Would it be better to let those things have articles of their own? Each of those things you mentioned are deserving of a separate discussion, at least in my opinion. Majintahu (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles of their own seems like the way to go with those. I'm willing to pave the way by unlinking the future red ones, and if some passing crat wants to ninja me, I think I can do it without annoying the RC watchers too much. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Have at it. Blue (pester) 02:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, will do, soon as I learn the robot dance. May take a few minutes... Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

The dirty deed is did. I (mostly) left talk pages alone. I will let someone else do the vaporizing, in case they wants to looks at "what links here" first. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I eated it. Blue (pester) 04:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)