There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Scientific American
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
There has got to be a way to work this into the cite. Wehpudicabok 04:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- You figure it out, and it will be done. ħuman
05:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, there is an XKCD comix that could illustrate every article we have. I think I got permissies to use one on some article somewhere... ħuman
05:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- They are CC-by-SA 2.5, you can use them any way. This is a more accurate description. - π 05:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Really? We should put that on their article or sumthin: Steal This Comic! That, er, "description" is just making me do more stupid things on RW... Oh, never mind, I have a 3/4 full roll of tinfoil, I'm safe. ħuman
05:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Really? We should put that on their article or sumthin: Steal This Comic! That, er, "description" is just making me do more stupid things on RW... Oh, never mind, I have a 3/4 full roll of tinfoil, I'm safe. ħuman
- They are CC-by-SA 2.5, you can use them any way. This is a more accurate description. - π 05:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep in mind, there is an XKCD comix that could illustrate every article we have. I think I got permissies to use one on some article somewhere... ħuman