2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $10064.65Goal: $10000

Talk:Scientists Confront Creationism

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can anyone phrase this better?

Stephen D. Schafersman Ph.D geology, uses Philosophy of Science to debunk the "Evolution is based on unproven preconceptions" argument.

here is what the actual title of the article is. "Creationists insist that the methods used to establish the geolical column are flawed because they are based on a prior commitment to Evo theory". (typos mine). I'm not sure the best way to word that.EnAttendantGodot2 (talk) 16:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)