Talk:Shaken baby syndrome
“”Shaken, not stirred
|
| —James Bond |
Give me some time to work on this, folks. As opposed to teh assfly , I'm actually going to do my homework here.--PalMD-Mmmm...Brains! 20:01, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Really, just give me a little more time. Record number of patients. I hate flu season (cha-ching)--PalMD-Mmmm...Brains! 10:31, 15 January 2008 (EST)
Actually, it wouldn't be aweful to use those references in the article anyway, if nothing more than to show the other (read: loony) side. They can't be that hard to refute, right? Lurker 14:57, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- That is my ultimate intention. Fuckin' wackos. Save them in the womb so you can bash their heads in out of the womb.162.82.215.199 15:41, 15 January 2008 (EST)
References for use[edit]
- Nonaccidental Head Injury in Infants — The “Shaken-Baby Syndrome”
Duhaime AC, Christian CW, Rorke LB, Zimmerman RA ... of the most frequently encountered form of infantile inflicted head injury, the so-called shaken-baby syndrome. Biomechanics and Terminology The names applied to the syndromes of inflicted head injury ... N Engl J Med 338:1822, June 18, 1998 Review Article
- Squier W.Shaken baby syndrome: the quest for evidence.Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Jan;50(1):10-4
- Shaken baby syndrome: evidence and experts.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Jan;50(1):6-7. No abstract available. PMID: 18173619 [PubMed - in process] Commentary/critique of squier
- Daune L MacGregor MD FRCPC (2008)
Shaken baby syndrome: the quest for evidence Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 50 (1), 8–8. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00008.x supports squier
"Denialism" or "Scepticism"? Or both?[edit]
With my "good sources" edits removed just moments after they were entered, I would like to understand why, and what I may do to improve the article.208.95.191.2 (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)