There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Any links on their anti-vax stance? I looked at some of their pharma articles and a few snippets seem to be making arguments by insinuation using mitochondrial disorder cases, but not more than that. It wouldn't surprise me, though, since I've seen nature woo creep in in other places on it. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- The last time I checked, they also had a Moon hoax page. :) Which reminds me that I wanted to write an article on Lucho...--ZooGuard (talk) 22:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- That got taken down. SW seems to be a mixed bag on some of the nature woo stuff. They link to Skeptic's Dictionary, Quackwatch, etc. but present some denialists and quacks as "credible" dissenters. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)