There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Suburban sprawl
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The map of negative equity looks exactly like a political map of the US, Which means for the first half of this decade Dummocrats liked to look richer than they were by getting $800,000 homes with zero down "liar loans" and now that housing prices are falling they're all upside-down. Francine 11:49, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
- The FNMA "conforming loan" limit for the last few years has been 417,000 for a single family dwelling, so that 800k figure is off by a bit. Where's that neg. eq. map, by the way? (PS, who's to say it isn't the GOPers in those areas that are upside-down?) ħuman
12:18, 7 October 2008 (EDT)