There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:The Origin of Human Nature: A Zen Buddhist Looks at Evolution
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoo boy. Wonder what'll happen if Cogswell sees this.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Meh. There is no rule that says zen masters can't be dipshits. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 23:48, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- But then, can you really say that Zen is atheistic? If you've already addressed this on the Zen talk page, I should tell you I am now ignoring that page for petty personal reasons, and I haven't read anything written there since my last post.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- You know whose problem that is. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Mine, definitely. That's why I said petty personal reasons.--User:Brxbrx/sig 00:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- You know whose problem that is. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- But then, can you really say that Zen is atheistic? If you've already addressed this on the Zen talk page, I should tell you I am now ignoring that page for petty personal reasons, and I haven't read anything written there since my last post.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)