Talk:The Positive Case for Design

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon creationism.svg

This Creationism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

Intelligent designers. Have you considered beavers, hornets, birds who build nests. Would that be classed as intelligence ? would humans recognise an alien artifact as deliberate design.? I believe that there were problems with humans trying to interpret the plaque sent out by NASA. Hamster (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Expected response: A nest isn't irreducibly complex. Of course, why irreducible complexity implies design isn't all that clear. Šţěŗĭļė earlobe 14:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

In regards to the first rebuttal[edit]

He doesn't say that the document will not be an argument against evolution, he only says that it will be a positive one, rather than a negative one that relies on God-of-the-gaps type thinking. Stilldeciding (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)