Talk:Uncyclopedia
Oh, it came from Liberapedia. Though really, what is the difference? 
pathetic 23:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- UC is funny in places and has some good writing? ħuman
23:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
"Wonderful satire"? "In the spirit of Oscar Wilde"? Are you shitting me?! comamaos 07:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah this article needs a rewrite. Any volunteers? - π 07:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comamaos, I think what you are citing there are called "jokes". ħuman 21:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comamaos, I think what you are citing there are called "jokes". ħuman
There are some hilariously funny articles on there and then there's some utter shit. It doesn't help that the admins are a bunch of bullies who watch each-other's backs at all times. It's like some sort of online gay bar. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 22:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete[edit]
ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 17:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Meh, why not. sshole 18:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
What a great thing to have at RationalWiki. So much more valuable than anti-creationist, counterapologetics, etc. Awesome. 
18:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The only reason I can see us keeping this is if there was a RatWiki culture that came FROM uncyclopedia or if many past users are uncyclopedians or if uncyclopedia did some kind of big strike against us or something... and even then, that stuff would be RationalWikiWiki stuff. ±
KnightOfTL;DRwalls of text while-u-wait 18:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The main thrust of the article is that UC says stuff about Conservapedia. So what? Delete. Sophiebecause liberals 18:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Only because I think it might stick in their craw. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- FOR GODS SAKE KEEPRandonGeneration (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)(sorry about the all caps)
- This discussion has been over for weeks, the only reason this isn't a redirect is the inseccent whining of brxbrx. Enough. ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 00:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- FOR GODS SAKE KEEPRandonGeneration (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)(sorry about the all caps)
- Only because I think it might stick in their craw. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The main thrust of the article is that UC says stuff about Conservapedia. So what? Delete. Sophiebecause liberals 18:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Links[edit]
Do you want just the mainspace links gone or do you want the archives cleansed as well? (I keep having to ask this question don't I) Peter with added ‼Science‼ 08:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, this too can be redirected to save redlinks. Peter with added ‼Science‼ 08:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)