Thanks for reverting Fosters censorship. Unfortunately Foster thinks he can rule this place with an iron fist, thankfully there are some good people left despite Fosters purges. 86.47.28.215 (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's the least I can do. Aspie jr is on the prowl today (and forever), so I don't think I have the time/effort required to overturn your block. Sorry. Censorship lives to see another day on RW. Occasionaluse (talk) 20:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Who's aspie senior?--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Annony user... A user's talk page should be able to be free of trolling, namecalling, etc. If you want to complain, there are better places to do it, and other people who might have a better ear than the person who is causing you the problems. I know that I remove anyone who name calls, or admits his posts are there just to piss me off. I don't need to see that on my page. If you've been blocked from talking on pages where you should be able to, as you say "defend yourself' then there are others to take that up with, without needing to troll.En attendant Godot 21:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- You do realise, that you, or someone, has trolltopped almost your entire talk page? Is that intentional? Isn't that a bit silly? (Trolltop should be blanked) (((Zack Martin)))™ 04:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hopefully, this here moribund cinderblock is to your liking. Be nice. Lyra § talk 15:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hear you've been around before my time. Looks like you've still got the good old mentality that I liked about this place. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- 'Bout time you show up again. How have things been going, user formerly known as Neveruse? The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 21:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Work sucks. Homeownership is a bitch. Things are well. It's nice to hear from you. How is it on your end? Occasionaluse (talk) 23:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Things are.... as they should be, I suppose. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 00:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Remember[edit]
It is impossible to spell "slaughter" without "laughter." The Goonie Punk Can't sleep, clowns will eat me! 22:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hey.... it's a good rhyme! --Idiot number 58 (talk) 05:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- I only wish I could write pottery as well as you can, Number 58. AnarchoGoon Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living 05:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Uh, you make me blush. What can I say? Try hard, just keep trying all the time, and maybe one day you reach my level. --Idiot number 58 (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, occasionule, how about deredddddding your user page link? I know you know how! ħuman 05:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I would have, but Nutty as already popped my user page cherry. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Please stop reverting edits[edit]
It is disruptive and the comment doesn't hurt you in anyway. AceX-102 21:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop being disruptive by throwing around insulting, overused templates in conversations you feel you're above participating in. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I quite like OccasionalUse, and I quite like Ace. There's only one way to settle this... FIIIIIGGHHT CrundyTalk nerdy to me 21:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- I never liked Ace, but at least he didn't used to get on my nerves so much with his trolling. Now he's as big a douche as Gerard and I find myself pining for the days when Huw ruled the wiki. *sigh* Occasionaluse (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
|
- I can't stand Ace, he drinks too much and won't stop banging my fiancee. He is a worthless scumbag with no scruples. AceX-102 21:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Tequila and fascism! ¡OLÉ OLÉ OLÉ! - David Gerard (talk) 21:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)|}
- Gerard, get this into your fucking skull. You are not funny. 86.40.101.73 (talk) 22:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- He really isn't. 86.40.ei.π (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
The Most Secret Order of the Fraternal Lovers of the Almighty Lord Jerboa have seen fit to admit you to their inner sanctum. Please collect your sacrificial initiation goat here. Normally, it would be a sacrificial virgin, but as we're based in Essex, we can't find any. --PsyGremlinSnakk! 15:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- But you're not anywhere as close to being a rightful leader of Rationalwiki... --Idiot number 59 (talk) 15:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Look, just because your application to the MSOFLALJ was blackballed... --PsyGremlinПоговорите! 15:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- What's that MSo... whatever... thing? ... anyway? Edit: Aah, I see. Edit2: There are actually greater forces here than that loya thing. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Now if I told you that, it wouldn't be a secret now, would it. --PsyGremlin話しなさい 16:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)And indded, the Lovely Jellybeans do have power, for as long as we let them
How did you perform that magic, Sir? --PsyGremlin말하십시오 16:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- The string in my "Included Pages" box in greasemonkey is: http://conservapedia.com/index.php?*RecentChanges*
- Hope that works for you. Sometimes it seems like KenFilter just randomly craps out and you have to refresh the page. Occasionaluse (talk) 16:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Tx! I'll have a fiddle and see what happens. --PsyGremlinSnakk! 16:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
You make me giggle[edit]
"When we lock the db, we should do it during off-peak hours. Preferably at night. The mechanism should be something we can easily turn off. Like a mode. We could call it "night mode". Occasionaluse (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)"
ROFLMFAO! Witty as hell! Conservative Punk (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm so glad someone appreciated that, Goonie. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Look ye mighty, and despair. [1] It is a toss up as to whether he makes Ken, RobS, and Andy seem SANE and NORMAL. He has a wiki devoted to his every fault. An iron, yet caring fist 21:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- You remain curiously silent. An iron, yet caring fist 22:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think being speechless is appropriate. Occasionaluse (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- And what have we learned? An iron, yet caring fist 23:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm mildly creeped out by this. Not so much by CWC himself as the reaction to him. The guy obviously has problems; why rag on him like the way people have done? What does it accomplish? Doctor Dark (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- For a slightly, shall we say, different take on the guy, there's this. DickTurpis (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
So that's how you do it[edit]
Thanks dude, :-D Civic Cat (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk page reverts[edit]
Stop it. ТyTalk. 17:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's archived, bitch. Eat a dick. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad you're still here. I can never tell how seriously you mean that LANCB stuff on your userpage. Mei III (talk) 22:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Occasionaluse (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Karajou generator[edit]
a possible endeavor...
You, <name>, are going to scour the <noun> known as <formal noun>, and I don't care how you do it. You can use a <implement> or take a jet to <action>, but you are going to go over every <unit> of that <noun> before you carry on with your opinion in this website. That is the only way I will accept from you the proof needed that the <noun> <formal noun> <is not what I want it to be>. Occasionaluse (talk) 02:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Your cat[edit]
<3<3<3 Mei III (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- :) Occasionaluse (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Aye, you do have a rather fine cat.--Mr. Bojangles (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Can we have debate here[edit]
You seem open minded and fair maybe we have debate here it will good to foster expression of ideas and such. They can't persecute you for open and honest expression of ideas on your page. Duke (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sadly, it seems like they can. The policy would have to be changed and I am very open to the option that it should be. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Can we work together to shape policy I think my ideas will be receptive to you freaks only if you are tolerant enough to listen to them rather than ban and cesnorshp Duke (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- I might be interested in seeing where it goes. I don't rule out the possibility that racism may have merits, or that racial disparities in crime/intelligence/etc exist. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well just look at the figures. Every black city in America is overridden with crime and murder, even middle class blacks are more likely to commit crimes like murder and domestic abuse, criminality is in their bloodstream and theres nothing we can do about it. Some choose to ignore it and hope the problem goes away, not that simple. I propose the division of America between blacks adn whites, each ethnic group will be moved to their area. Blacks will get parts of Appalachia and the DC area, whites everything else. Duke (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
"Users I like"[edit]
Why me? Blue (is useful) 22:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- The lists are pretty capricious, so I may or may not have had something(s) specific in mind. I'll let you know if they come to me. Occasionaluse (talk) 22:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- cause you added yourself when he first started it.166.216.162.165 (talk) 23:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- ... I guess it's your initiative. Occasionaluse (talk) 00:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh. That's slightly disappointing. I'd honestly forgotten. Blue (is useful) 17:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- So did I! Occasionaluse (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Fixt. For great justice. Mei III (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
You're doing it again.[edit]
I've already promoted you once for dishing out stupid bocks and edit warring when you're wrong. Now you're doing it again. Behave, or be elsewhere. --PsyGremlinPrata! 15:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- How am I wrong? And why is it always my fault that you guys don't respect RW:CS? Occasionaluse (talk)
- Now now. No need to HCM over this. In truth, I'm not actually taking this very seriously. I haven't taken it seriously ever since the edit war with Occasionaluse started. The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 15:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm only serious insomuch as I find the argument interesting. I would have liked to see you debate your changes before wheel-warring my revert. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I'm filing my removal from their userpage under the "joke edits" section of Community Standards on user pages. Thus, It is acceptable unless the user themselves says that it is not welcome. The Goonie Punk Can't sleep, clowns will eat me! 15:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- (ec) Because you FUCKING QUOTEMINE THE FUCKING COMMUNITY STANDARD YOU'RE FUCKING QUOTING, YOU FUCKING MONUMENTAL PRICK. Read the full thing and then get back to me. --PsyGremlin話しなさい 15:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Coming from the guy who labeled support for Goonie as spam? RUFKM? Calm the fuck down. User your words. Preferably the lower-case ones. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- "Support" from a troll, that he would rather not have. You know, you carry on like a little bitch and you wonder why everybody thinks you're Marcus and hates you. Also, why are you so interested in supporting a troll. Unless you were behind the vandalism? --PsyGremlinZungumza! 15:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if Hitler says he supports Goonie (which a little bird told me was true), Goonie is not allowed to censor him from saying so. Be rational. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
|
HALT!
|
Thank you[edit]
Thank you for supporting me. As I have privately explained to Mei, this is all a misunderstanding. Im so sorry this has happened. Alyssa Bryant (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Unless you want it there, do you mind if I revert? ТyTalk. 14:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- revert what? Occasionaluse (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- oh, lol. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah. ТyTalk. 14:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
"An editor's user page, and other pages in their user space, is their personal space and they are free to do with it what they want."[edit]
"An editor's user page, and other pages in their user space, is their personal space and they are free to do with it what they want." Please respect our rules or feel free to GTFO.
I suggest that you tell the same thing to NR.--ZooGuard (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why should he? Nutty Roux is a respected and established member who has earnt his place as a temperamental wanker. You, on the other hand, are an easily replacable noob. MarcusCicero (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Anyway, all this "he did it so I can do it" shit aside, I'm well aware of the policy, which is why I simply asked these people to stop editing my userpage instead of making a big deal about it. Nutty Roux (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Following precedent set by the Cabal, I reserve the right to selectively enforce the community standards. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Phantom Hoover[edit]
WTF? Unblock, plz. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Teasing[edit]
You know that I'm teasing you right? --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 15:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I do. Thanks for clarifying. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- It seems important these days, as just about everyone is on a hairs trigger to snap and lash out at you... :( sad. --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 15:45, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
I am not good at internets. X Stickman (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. I fixed and put you back in. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- While I'm here I just have to say that every time I see your username, I read it as "Occasional Louse", which reminds me of Franz Kafka, which in turn reminds me of this. Which makes me smile. X Stickman (talk) 23:21, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm reaching out to you[edit]
Do you think Cracker should be eliminated? Mark Antony (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
DMorris?[edit]
You are DMorris? You, apparently, lied about being brxbrx. However, I still think that you really are him, and that you invented this whole "virginity" debate as a way to pretend that he is not your sock-puppet. In addition, you know a suspicious amount about the Port High incident. So, who are you?--Lefty (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Occaisionaluse is a clever and witty fellow with a creative and sharp wit. DMorris is a mouth-breathing idiot whose idea of an argument is to say "sez you!" or "that's for me to know and you to find out" and then claim to have reported his opponents to the Florida department of Internet Busybodies. I would be profoundly disappointed if they turned out to be the same person. P-Foster (talk) 21:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, will people stop with the sockpuppet paranoia already? (((Zack Martin)))™ 21:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Nope, sock of Eira. The unbusinesslikeman of business 22:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, to tell you the truth, I'm really a sock of ... (((Zack Martin)))™
- That is not true. If you were my sock, you would be just as incompetent at editing as I am......anyhow, you were here before me, so I would be your sock (which is again, not true).--Lefty (talk) 23:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- That is because I too am a sock of Eira, P-Foster, and Occasionaluse. Simultaneously. The unbusinesslikeman of business 22:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- WTF? You're not Occasionaluse. Occasionaluse has been run by a team that you're not on since we shut the Neveruse persona down last year. P-Foster may or may not be on that team. I'm not at liberty to divulge that information. Eira is on a different team running another well known and longstanding "editor." These things shouldn't be spoken of out in the open. Jesus people. Nutty Roux (talk) 23:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- I am a sock of Trent, who in turn is a sock of Jimbo Wales. And Jimbo is a sock of Jenny McCarthy. Doctor Dark (talk) 23:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Funny, all my socks are Fruit of the Loom. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
All right, then what team runs DMorris (I just hope that no one could actually be as ignorant and stupid as he is!)?--Lefty (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- DMorris is a bright but troubled young person. No team required to do what he does. Nutty Roux (talk) 00:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- My faith in humanity just dropped by 24%.--Lefty (talk) 00:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- this entire thread is an argument for instating draconian use of check user. And I think I'm convinced.--User:Brxbrx/sig 00:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
A fair compromise[edit]
User is now able to comment on their talkpage. Aceof Spades 21:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I get it. Ok. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
ConservapediaEditor[edit]
Seriously, brah? P-FosterCan't we talk about this, baby? 18:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thems just joke blocks. Inside jokes. Inside my head, that is. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Wait, what?[edit]
Extended content
|
Dear Marcus Occasionaluse,
How, exactly does it work that you reinsert trolling on my talk page, telling me to hide it with a template, and a few moments later remove trolling from your own claiming that it's "your prerogative?" P-FosterThe Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire. Discuss. 22:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Its called showing up your double standards. You never did have a great eye for irony, did you? Thats something all fascists share in common, they're always more interested in stamping on free speech rather than growing a sense of humour. 86.41.239.93 (talk) 10:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- And this immediately after your post about "proper and respectful courtesies." You really are pathetic, aren't you. PsyGremlinZungumza! 10:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Gremlin I really wouldn't expect you to understand the delicious irony there, you're a halfwit completely out his depth here, far too busy roaring racist obscenities at passing black people. 86.46.188.67 (talk) 12:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's no double standard. The comment PFoster removed from his talk page was a personal attack from a self-admitted troll. The comment Occasionaluse removed from his was not. -- Nx / talk 10:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
|
Chicken coop[edit]
RationalWiki:Chicken coop#Occasionaluse -- Nx / talk 15:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not reinsert MC's comments. See RationalWiki:All things in moderation/Marcus Cicero (2) -- Nx / talk 14:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Rebuttal; please see fuck off, get a life, lose your virginity, and stop eating donuts'. Cordially, MC. 86.41.159.219 (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Just because a faction of users goes rogue and starts issuing edicts doesn't mean anything. Fuck off, Nx, you waste of aspie obsession. Occasionaluse (talk)
Wu-Gambinos[edit]
I support your protest against mindless authoritarianism. Do you support Raekwon and Ghostface Killah?
Feel free to trolltop this. 14:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, I do. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- You are the best kind of editor we could have. Whether you know it or not, you're helping normalize relations between those on the side of right who appreciate classic hip hop and those on the side of evil who secretly listen to Justin Bieber but claim they're into Led Zeppelin. 15:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
It's been too long[edit]
I'm not going anywhere but it makes me sad to see how you'd treat our suicide pact. Let's rekindle. 15:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Rekindle we shall. I'm in asia all next week. Maybe after I can come fuck up your part of town. Occasionaluse (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
on the street is that you're a self-admitted troll. What's the scoop? WēāŝēīōīďMethinks it is a Weasel 03:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- I have admitted that I was trolling in specific instances, does that mean I'm an admitted troll? And if I have been a troll, am I always a troll? That seems to be up to whoever disagrees with me. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's as I thought. WěǎšěǐǒǐďMethinks it is a Weasel 14:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's probably up to just one loudmouth punk. I'm a troll too. You will be if you're not already, Weaseloid. Hey what's up OU. Holler. 14:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Long time no see.[edit]
'Sup, man? Looks like I'm headed to Louisville to work with the Corps of Engineers for my next duty assignment, reporting sometime in July or August. Are you still in that one city that you were in? If so, I could use some backup because I am doing the Creation Museum come Hell or high water. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hell yeah! Occasionaluse (talk) 14:25, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- FA, if you seriously are planning to visit O-Use, I seriously recommend that you retain legal counsel before heading out. It took months to work through the repercussions of what he left in the trunk of my car. (Also, That shit wasn't funny, O-Use. Those people had families, goddammit, and a very different idea about what it meant to "donate" one's body to "science"). P-Foster Talk "a cheetos-eating, Mountain-Dew drinking vlogger living in someone's basement." 14:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- I had power of attorney, so it was my duty to do everything in my capacity to act in accordance with my interpretation of his wishes. And the fact that Mrs. Foster required therapy is most likely your fault. Don't scapegoat me, bro. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Do you think you'll get a discount for showing up in your BDUs? :-) Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- "Active duty members of the United States Armed Forces (Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard) receive a free general admission ticket with a current military photo ID and the purchase of any regularly priced adult general admission." A little odd, but whatever... Occasionaluse (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Don't worry, OU, DADT has been repealed so you can pretend to be my same-sex domestic life partner. As far as attire, I'm divided on whether I'll wear my "I'm no rocket surgeon" t-shirt or go and get one of those ones they sell at the PX that has "INFIDEL" written on it in English and Arabic. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- They sell that at the PX? lol.. I plan on wearing the "I love dinosaurs" shirt I bought last time I was there. Occasionaluse (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to whine at you[edit]
Which ever or what ever "you" you are. I don't knwo if you are one person running OC or 10. But the one I'm yapping to today. :-) Weight is hard, cause it's just not "easy". And listening to these low carbers drives me nuts. ;-) Lower and healthy carbs, sure. but the "eat as much meat as you want to get full", and "eat fat"... it doesn't work, I've tried it. What works is what you said. careful monitoring of what you eat. but that's hard and annoying and SLOW for me. (I give up, after about 6 months, usually, casue by then i'm back in france, and it's really hard to be on a diet in France. hehe). I know that every 1/2 pound is one success, and it gets me closer to actually being able to walk more, which then means slightly more cals! but it's a whiny whiny thing, and 'some people' are just amusing or annoying me. but just wanted to say, sorry you are getting my whines. and it's cool you are where you are! Godotoi, putain, genial, merci 19:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't mind your whines at all. I've got a sympathetic ear to anyone putting in the effort that you are. Occasionaluse (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- We had to back off our plan to france, cause of the cost of flights,so we won't go till december or 1 year from now. I figure if i walk 1/2 mile every other day for a month, I can add 1/2 a mile the next month. and 1/2 mile after that. and within a year, be able to walk about 3-5 miles. I know for a fact that as soon as I get decent movement in, (even slow movement) the weight will be easier, or i can add a few more cals - either way any given week. heh. i should get my ass back to working... but RW is so much more fun than writing election plans. :-)--Godotoi, putain, genial, merci 20:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
UHM in the Vandal Bin[edit]
He went on a deletion spree this morning. No doubt. That's vandalism. Vandals who do vandalism go in the vandal bin. P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 21:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I am starting to come around to your way of thinking. Burn the bastard down and salt the soil. AceModerator 10:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's almost hard to remember what we did without it, which is scary. Yes, this cleansing fire is exactly what we need. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Nutty Roux[edit]
Do you plan to desysop Nutty so he can't unblock himself? Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- No, that was a critique on the current exercise in futility. Occasionaluse (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Dead serious question[edit]
"Depends on who you ask, that's why it's so interesting." How the hell do you write that in an article! I think it's a blast to watch people run around telling others what bad christians (or buddhists, or muslims) they are. But framing what is going on, into a RW article might take talent I don't possess! :-)--GodotWhen I graduated, Cognative Science of Religion didn't even exist! now it's everywhere 16:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking about finding examples of Christians using the "Cafeteria" concept (most likely not by name) to describe other sects. I would imagine that pretty much anything said by sect X about sect Y could be framed in terms of Cafeteria Christianity. Occasionaluse (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Cool idea. "ask and you shall receive", some generic One said, somewhere. ;-) Anyhow, I'm going to try to clean it up, get it into something that resembles the use in the real world. --GodotWhen I graduated, Cognative Science of Religion didn't even exist! now it's everywhere 16:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh shit he's dead[edit]
13:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- That'll work. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
So, by your logic...[edit]
Since, I dunno what the number is, but surely its millions of women all around the world are raped and/or murdered each year, we shouldn't say anything specifically about the unnamed woman from Delhi who dies in Singapore last night (my time...), 'cause that would make us hypocrites, right? Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made." 15:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- You kind of summed it up without realizing it, no surprise. Millions of women are raped and murdered each year (or whatever). Dozens of kids are killed in school shootings. Another way you might be able to understand, it's like taking the woman in Delhi and trying to focus on women raped on buses. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Don't forget[edit]
Me and Sterile on the 14th. We gunna Ham it up. 02:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- fuck, 14th of what month? December? I am going to forget that.. Occasionaluse (talk) 02:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- October dipshit. Also, I made up a cocktail called "prosecco, gin, and Campari with one ice cube." 02:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- gin and red cream soda. We're going on a monday? Occasionaluse (talk) 02:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- You picked the date. Were you drunk? 02:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Probably, but whatever, it works. Occasionaluse (talk) 02:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- I am not remotely joking when I say I intend to be fucked up on benzos and liquor before I go into that place. And I'm wearing a cruxifix with a little jesus on it. I got it at Maxwell Street this summer. 03:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Excellent suggestion[edit]
I like this idea, but how do you propose we go about implementing it? Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Unilaterally! Occasionaluse (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
|